Der Anaesthesist
-
Injuries to the oro-dental tissue are still one of the most frequent mishaps during endotracheal intubation and general anaesthesia. However, damage to the soft and hard tissues in most cases involves oral structures already showing advanced pathogenic alterations. Injuries to the teeth are therefore rather more often due to the disease of the teeth than to mistakes during anaesthesia. ⋯ This review gives information about the causes and types of injuries to the oral and maxillofacial region during general anaesthesia. In addition, the anatomical conditions and pathological changes associated with an increased risk for oro-dental injuries and the facilities for prevention are discussed. Finally, the main aspects of emergency treatment of injuries to the dental hard tissues are presented.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[CSE vs. augmented epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Spinal and epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine 0.5% "isobar" require augmentation].
Incomplete anaesthesia is a major clinical problem both in single spinal and in single epidural anaesthesia. The clinical efficacy of epidural anaesthesia with augmentation (aEA) and combined epidural and spinal anesthesia (CSE) for cesarean section was investigated in a prospective randomized study on 45 patients. ⋯ The extension of anaesthesia achieved in epidural anaesthesia after an initial dose of 101.8 mg bupivacaine and augmenting dose of 99 mg lidocaine reached the segment Th5. The primary spinal anaesthesia dose up to 15 mg corresponding to height led to a segmental extension to a maximum of Th3 under CSE. Augmentation was necessary in 13 patients; in 5 cases because of inadequate extent of anaesthesia and 8 cases because of pain resulting from premature reversion. The augmenting dose required was 13.9 ml. Readiness for operation was attained after 19.8 min (aEA) and after 10.5 min (CSE). No patient required analgesics before delivery. The additional analgesic requirement during operation was 63.6% (aEA) and 39.1% (CSE). Taking into account pain in the area of surgery, the requirement of analgesics was 50% (aEA) vs. 17.4% (CSE). Antiemetics were required in 18.2 (aEA) and in 65.2% (CSE). The systolic blood pressure fell by 17.7% (aEA) and in 30.3% (CSE). The minimum systolic pressure was observed after 13.4 min in aEA, and after 9.5 min in CSE. The APGAR score and the umbilical pH did not show any differences. General anaesthesia was not required in any case.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Does intrathecal clonidine prolong the effect of spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric mepivacaine? A randomized double-blind study].
Clonidine, an alpha 2-receptor agonist, has been reported to prolong the blocking actions of local anaesthetics. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of spinally injected clonidine on the duration of spinal anaesthesia by mepivacaine and on the postoperative demand for analgesics. ⋯ While clonidine prolonged sensory analgesia, there was also an undesirable prolongation of motor block postoperatively. In addition, there was a significant and long lasting reduction in heart rate and mean arterial pressure in both clonidine groups. Unfavourably, postoperative demand of analgesics was not reduced by spinal injection of clonidine. Thus, the routine addition of clonidine for spinal anaesthesia with local anaesthetics is not recommended.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Postoperative vomiting. A score for prediction of vomiting risk following inhalation anesthesia].
Despite numerous factors are thought to affect postoperative vomiting (PV) recent studies demonstrated that the risk of PV can be predicted by considering just the most important ones. Therefore, the aim of this study was to present the clinically most relevant factors, a risk score based upon those factors and its clinical applicability for other types of surgery. ⋯ The risk for PV after inhalational anaesthesia in adults can be predicted using a score which is based on individual risk factors and the duration of anaesthesia only.
-
Obviously there is a world-wide trend towards regional analgesia for pain relief during delivery. Data on the current practice in Germany are lacking. ⋯ In 1977, 14 of 18 university departments of anaesthesiology offered epidural analgesia for parturients. This option was available in all university departments in 1996. A mean rate of 10-20% epidurals for vaginal delivery is well within the limits reported from other countries, whereas the rate of regional anaesthesia for scheduled caesarean section (40%) still is rather low in Germany, as reported in part 1 of this survey (Anaesthesist 1998;47:59-63).