Der Anaesthesist
-
The authors report a rare, recently diagnosed and atypical mishap during one-lung ventilation (OLV) via a double lumen tube (DLT) and left-sided thoracotomy: an ipsilateral pneumothorax during ventilation of the right lung. This occurred in a 63-year-old patient with chronic obstructive airway disease who was scheduled for urgent repair of a descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. Anaesthesia and surgery were uneventful until aortic cross-clamping release. ⋯ Yet, during thoracotomy, decrease in cardiac filling and output during tension pneumothorax in OLV obviously results primarily from the immovability of the mediastinum owing to mediastinal fixation and is at least as decisive as the contralateral intrathoracic pressure in closed-chest patients. In summary, a tension pneumothorax during one-lung ventilation and thoracotomy is a rare, but disastrous complication during the use of a DLT, which has not, to our knowledge, been reported previously. We recommend that tension pneumothorax be added to the list of complications and problems during OLV by the use of a DLT, especially in patients with structural lung diseases.
-
We report a case of irreversible unilateral hypoglossal nerve palsy in connection with nasal septum surgery in intubation anaesthesia. On account of the spatial distance, there is no danger of injuring the hypoglossal nerve during nasal surgery. However, in the otorhinolaryngological and anaesthesiological literature, some cases of hypoglossal palsy following endotracheal intubation, use of the laryngeal mask airway, bronchoscopy and laryngoscopy are reported. ⋯ According to the available publications, it must be assumed that in the process of intubation pressure from the MacIntosh blade was the cause of the hypoglossal palsy. This complication is extremely rare, so that routine preoperative briefing of the patient does not appear necessary.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Thromboembolism prevention with low dose heparin and spinal anesthesia--a risky combination?].
Spinal or intracranial haematoma is a rare but severe complication of spinal/epidural anaesthesia with an incidence of less than 1:100,000. Coagulation defects, traumatic puncture, and anticoagulant drugs are assumed to be risk factors for the development of this kind of haematoma. Whether the risk of bleeding after spinal/epidural anaesthesia is increased by the administration of low-dose heparin (unfractionated or fractionated) for thromboprophylaxis is currently under discussion. ⋯ We suggest that the development of spinal or intracranial haematoma after spinal/epidural anaesthesia is a multifactorial event. An influence of low-dose heparin prophylaxis as a cofactor cannot wholly be excluded because of the difficulty of studying the problem in a prospective way. The few case reports have to be seen in the context of millions of patients who have received either unfractionated or LMW heparin and lumbar or thoracic regional anaesthesia without any complication. We conclude that low-dose heparin prophylaxis (fractionated or unfractionated) is not a definite contraindication to spinal/epidural anaesthesia. High-risk (ASA III/IV) patients in particular benefit from effective postoperative analgesia achieved by local anaesthetics in combination with effective heparin thromboprophylaxis. Nevertheless, the absolute contraindications for regional anaesthesia must be respected and an individual risk/benefit analysis should be performed for every patient. An adequate time interval between application of heparin and regional anaesthesia or removal of a spinal/epidural catheter, atraumatic puncture technique, and careful neurologic monitoring during the post-operative period can minimise the risk of complications.