Der Anaesthesist
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[A comparison of autologous transfusion procedures in hip surgery].
The risks associated with transfusion can be minimized with autologous blood. The efficiency of preoperative deposit, preoperative hemodilution and intra- and postoperative autotransfusion in reducing homologous transfusions has been demonstrated. There seem to be few studies, however, that compared the different methods of autologous transfusion. ⋯ CONCLUSION. Under the conditions studied, preoperative autologous deposit was the most efficient method of autologous transfusion for hip arthroplasty. It should be employed primarily.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[The use of ketamine and midazolam for analgesia and sedation in ventilated patients subject to obligatory treatment with catecholamines].
This study was undertaken to compare two regimens for analgesic sedation in intensive care patients with exogenous catecholamine therapy, giving special regard to catecholamine demand and hemodynamic parameters. A total of 20 ventilated patients in a surgical intensive care unit were investigated in a prospectively randomized design. Exogenous catecholamine therapy with epinephrine and/or norepinephrine was started at systolic pressure (SAP) less than 85 mmHg or mean arterial pressure (MAP) less than 65 mmHg to maintain cardiovascular function. ⋯ In time course, PAP increased by about 5 mmHg in the ketamine group but not in the fentanyl group (P = 0.009). The average central venous pressure (CVP) was 12 mmHg in both groups. At the end of the investigation, CVP decreased in the fentanyl group and increased in the ketamine group (P = 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Acoustic evoked potentials of medium latency and intraoperative wakefulness during anesthesia maintenance using propofol, isoflurane and flunitrazepam/fentanyl].
Auditory evoked potentials have been used as an indicator of awareness. During combined local and general anesthesia clinical signs of adequate anesthesia are difficult to evaluate. In the present study we combined peridural analgesia with three techniques of general anesthesia. ⋯ CONCLUSIONS. The maintenance of MLAEP and the primary cortical complex Na/Pa correlates with the incidence of motor signs of wakefulness. During the combination of regional and general anesthesia, isoflurane and propofol seem to provide better suppression of intraoperative wakefulness than bolus injections of flunitrazepam/fentanyl.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Propofol for induction and maintenance of anesthesia during heart surgery. Results of pharmacological studies in man].
Numerous reports have concluded that propofol is suitable for maintenance of anesthesia by continuous infusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of propofol and fentanyl for coronary bypass surgery in patients with good left ventricular function. The effects of this anesthetic combination on quality of anesthesia, hemodynamic status, and endocrine and metabolic responses were assessed. ⋯ CONCLUSION. In summary, it can be concluded that a propofol infusion technique positively enhances the recovery period after cardiac surgery and provides good control during anesthesia. However, the use of propofolfentanyl for induction of anesthesia in patients with limited coronary perfusion is not recommended because of its hypotensive effect.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Sinusitis in long-term intubated, intensive care patients: nasal versus oral intubation].
Discussion of paranasal sinusitis as a nosocomial infection in the mechanically ventilated intensive care (ICU) patient has recently been intensified. Some authors have emphasized nasotracheal intubation as a possible pathogenetic pathway. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of nasotracheal or orotracheal intubation on the development of sinusitis in ICU patients. ⋯ We found that patients intubated orotracheally developed significantly less sinusitis than those intubated nasotracheally. Edema, local infection of the nasal mucosa, or mechanical obstruction of sinus drainage pathways by the tube are possible explanations. The fact that 63% of orally intubated patients had a pathologic maxillary sinus finding as well suggests that in addition to other reasons, an increased central venous pressure, positive pressure ventilation, and the supine position must be regarded as predisposing factors that increase the incidence of sinusitis. We conclude that the conditions of critically ill patients predispose to the development of sinusitis. Nasotracheal intubation is to be regarded as an additional risk, and therefore oral intubation should be preferred.