Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
-
To determine the short-term outcome of patients with a known seizure disorder who have a seizure, are evaluated by out-of-hospital care providers, and refuse transport. ⋯ Most patients (94.2%) who were evaluated by out-of-hospital care providers for a seizure and refused transport had no further seizure activity in the subsequent 72 hours. However, because there is a risk of recurrence, out-of-hospital care providers and medical command physicians should ensure that patients understand the risks of refusal.
-
Residential carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning represents a significant cause of unintentional morbidity and mortality in the United States. Screening by fire departments and utility companies is usually limited to instances in which there are symptoms of CO poisoning or there is activation of a home CO detector. ⋯ Emergency medical services personnel can perform routine CO screening and detect occult elevations in CO levels during 911 responses. Public knowledge of CO poisoning is limited and the use of home CO detectors is rare in this study population.
-
To describe a novel endotracheal intubation technique, magnetically guided intubation (MGI), and its rate of success in inexperienced medical students and interns using an airway mannequin model. ⋯ A novel method of orotracheal intubation using magnetic guidance is described as achieving a high rate of successful intubations when performed by inexperienced intubators.
-
Case Reports
Ethics seminars: Consent and refusal in an urban American emergency department: two case studies.
Patients in the emergency department frequently voice refusals of care or are unable or unwilling to consent to care. While general principles surrounding consent and refusal can be articulated in theory, it is often far more complicated in the real setting. Further, it is impossible to contemplate in advance every possible situation that might arise. ⋯ Emergency physicians face such complex decisions on a routine basis. Ethical reasoning skills are obviously a core competence in emergency medicine, even if easy answers are elusive. Two cases are presented that illustrate this complexity, and routes to resolution are discussed.