Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
-
The Trauma and Injury Severity Scoring (TRISS) system was developed in the 1980s to improve the prediction of patient outcomes following trauma through the use of physiological and anatomical criteria. The TRISS is used for a number of purposes, including quantifying the severity of injury of a patient population, calculating the probability of survival of patients for identification of cases for peer review, and comparing the death or survival rates of different populations/hospitals. ⋯ This article critically evaluates the development, structure, and practical use of TRISS to determine its value in the current trauma environment. Limitations of TRISS are discussed and suggestions are made for the future development of trauma prediction tools.
-
To describe the availability of next-of-kin (NOK) for proxy consent over the 24-hour time period following presentation of major trauma patients to a Level I trauma center. ⋯ One third of the trauma patients in this study did not have NOK available two hours following arrival in the emergency department. For time-critical research protocols, the time to NOK contact can significantly impact the ability to ensure prompt enrollment and treatment in clinical trials. Further studies are needed to assess the generalizability and consistency of these data.
-
To characterize psychiatric-related emergency department visits (PREDVs) among adults in the United States for the year 2000 and to analyze PREDV trends from 1992 to 2000. ⋯ Psychiatric-related ED visits represent a substantial and growing number of ED visits each year. Patient characteristics influence the likelihood of a PREDV. Further research is needed to better understand the role that hospital EDs play in the delivery of health care services to those with mental illness.
-
Medical record review (MRR) studies have been reported to make up 25% of all scientific studies published in emergency medical (EM) journals. However, unlike other study designs, there are no standards for reporting MRRs and very little literature on the methodology for conducting them. The purpose of this article is to provide the reader with methodological guidance regarding the strengths and weaknesses of these types of studies.