Annals of surgical oncology
-
In order to improve prognostic applications and treatment decisions, we report our experiences of visceral pleural surface invasion (VPSI) in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with pleural retraction. ⋯ VPSI is an independent factor for poor prognosis in NSCLCs, regardless of lymph node status. Stage IB NSCLCs with PL1 pleural invasion are associated with a survival rate similar to that of stage IA NSCLCs and could be classified as T1 lesions. While surgical treatment is adequate in these patients, stage IB NSCLCs with VPSI have poor prognosis, and these patients should be considered for adjuvant chemotherapy.
-
The interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer has arbitrarily been set at 6-8 weeks. However, tumor regression is variable. This study aimed to evaluate whether the interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery had an impact on pathologic response and on surgical and oncologic outcome. ⋯ In this retrospective analysis, there seems to be an association between a longer interval after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and complete pathologic response without affecting postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay, and with no detrimental effect on oncologic outcome.
-
Meta Analysis
Complete pathologic response after combined modality treatment for rectal cancer and long-term survival: a meta-analysis.
Complete pathologic response (CPR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (combined modality treatment, CMT) for rectal cancer seems associated with improved survival compared to partial or no response (NPR). However, previous reports have been limited by small sample size and single-institution design. ⋯ CPR after CMT for rectal cancer is associated with improved local and distal control as well as better OS and DFS.
-
This study was designed to evaluate the long-time outcome of patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) undergoing different types of therapy and identify prognosis factors. ⋯ Patients with CRLM could get long-term survival benefit from different types of therapy, and resection of liver metastases was the optimal strategy. A predictive model using these above five factors may be of use in stratifying patients who may benefit from intensive surveillance and adjuvant therapy.
-
Our aim was to compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US) in measuring the size of invasive breast cancer (IBC) and carcinoma in situ (CIS). We also examined the utility of routinely performing MRI in addition to US before breast-conserving surgery (BCS). ⋯ Breast MRI provided more accurate estimates of tumor size, correlating better with pathologic tumor size than US for both IBC and CIS. However, no clear benefit in terms of lower re-excision rate, higher breast conservation success, or reduced recurrence emerged for routine use of breast MRI before BCS.