Journal of the American College of Surgeons
-
Penetrating wounds to the upper abdomen and lower precordium mandate exclusion of intra-abdominal and cardiac injuries. The most sensitive test to exclude cardiac injury is direct visualization of the pericardial fluid. Since 2001, we have examined the abdomen and performed transdiaphragmatic (central tendon) pericardial window via laparoscopy in stable patients at risk for both cardiac and peritoneal injuries. ⋯ Diagnostic laparoscopy with transdiaphragmatic pericardial window allows for thorough evaluation of both abdominal and cardiac injuries with a resultant short length of stay and no morbidity or mortality. In this, the largest series in the literature, laparoscopic pericardial window was a safe and effective modality to evaluate hemodynamically stable patients who are at risk for both cardiac and abdominal injuries.
-
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common hospital-acquired infections in the United States. We hypothesized that the risk of UTI after colorectal surgery exceeds the risk after other gastrointestinal operations. ⋯ Colorectal resections incur substantial risk of postoperative UTI, exceeding rates predicted by the NSQIP model. Because of their patients' unanticipated high incidence of UTI, surgeons with a specialty interest in colorectal surgery risk being flagged as "high outliers," particularly if they perform many rectal resections. A simple set of risk factors discriminates 10-fold differences in the rate of UTI after colorectal resection.
-
Accreditation of Centers of Excellence in bariatric surgery requires a hospital volume of more than 125 procedures/year. There is no evidence-based rationale for this specific threshold. Our objective was to evaluate the contemporary perioperative safety of bariatric surgery and to characterize the relationship between volume and outcomes. ⋯ Using a nationwide dataset and bariatric procedure-specific data, we have demonstrated that bariatric surgery mortality and complication rates are very low. A definite volume-outcomes relationship exists when hospital-level data are analyzed, but there is no inflection point to justify selecting a specific volume threshold to determine Centers of Excellence. Low-volume centers with extremely low complication rates can be identified and, conversely, there are high-volume centers with elevated rates of complication.