Current opinion in critical care
-
Vasoactive drugs are the mainstay of hemodynamic management of vasodilatory shock when fluids fail to restore tissue perfusion. In this review, studies published during the past year that increase our understanding of the use of vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit are discussed. ⋯ Over the last 40 years, there have been few controlled clinical trials to guide clinicians on the use of vasoactive drugs of treating shock states. It is not known whether the currently favored combination of norepinephrine and dobutamine is superior to traditional therapy with dopamine. Epinephrine is not recommended as the first-line therapy. The role of vasopressin and terlipressin remains unknown. Three large ongoing clinical trials will be completed soon and the results should clarify the role of these various agents.
-
Measuring stroke volume or cardiac output is of paramount importance for the management of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit, or 'high risk' surgical patients in the operating room. The new noninvasive techniques are gaining acceptance among intensivists and anesthesiologists who have been trained almost exclusively in the pulmonary artery catheter and the thermodilution technique. ⋯ By making cardiac output easily measurable in various settings, these techniques should all contribute to improve hemodynamic management in critically ill or high-risk surgical patients.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Oct 2005
ReviewGlucocorticoids in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock.
Septic shock remains one of the leading causes of death in intensive care units. In recent years, there is general use of low to moderate doses of corticosteroids in the treatment of septic shock. However, there are wide variations in the practical modality of this treatment, mainly with regard to patients' selection, treatment's dose, timing, route of administration, duration, and weaning. This review provides opinion-based guidelines for the use of corticosteroids in severe sepsis and septic shock. ⋯ In septic shock, intravenous hydrocortisone should be started immediately after a 250 microg corticotropin test, at a dose of 200-300 mg per day. When adrenal insufficiency is confirmed, treatment should be continued at full doses for 7 days. Otherwise, hydrocortisone should be stopped. It is worth considering adding enteral fludrocortisone at a dose of 50 microg per day for 7 days. In severe sepsis, despite growing evidence to support the use of a moderate dose of corticosteroids, the efficacy and safety of this treatment needs to be assessed in a large-scale study.
-
The purpose of this review is to indicate recent developments in biomarkers of sepsis and to evaluate their impact on clinical use. According to the 'surviving sepsis campaign,' diagnosis of sepsis and infection is urgent; early and specific treatment is most effective to reduce complications and to decrease mortality. ⋯ Recent data and cumulative analyses indicate that biomarkers of sepsis improve diagnosis of sepsis. However, only a few markers have impact on therapy and fulfill the clinical requirements. Procalcitonin is a well-established marker, indicating infection, sepsis, and progression to the more severe stages of the disease. Today, this biomarker should be in the diagnostic portfolio of an intensive care unit or emergency ward.
-
Recent studies have provided a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms responsible for hemolytic uremic syndromes. In this review, we summarize biochemical and genetic data that may lead to new clinical approaches. ⋯ Shiga-like toxin-1 and Shiga-like toxin-2 regulate genes that encode for chemokines, cytokines, cell adhesion molecules, and transcription factors involved in immune response and apoptosis. Mutations in factor H, membrane cofactor protein and factor I have recently been identified. Reduced expression of compliment regulators might prevent restriction of complement deposition on glomerular endothelial cells, leading to microvascular cell damage and tissue injury. Shiga-like toxin hemolytic uremic syndrome in children has a favorable prognosis in 90% of cases; kidney transplantation shows a good graft survival rate (80%) in children who progress to end stage renal disease. As for non-Shiga-like toxin hemolytic uremic syndrome, treatment with plasma infusion or exchange has been used with controversial effects. Kidney transplantation is not recommended in those patients with mutations in factor H and factor I; however, a kidney transplant corrects membrane cofactor protein dysfunction. These findings vividly underscore the clinical heterogeneity of outcomes depending upon the nature of the underlying cause of the disease.