The breast journal
-
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with supraclavicular nodal failure (SCF) in patients with one to three positive axillary nodes treated with breast conserving surgery and axillary dissection without supraclavicular node radiation (S/C RT) to aid in the selection of patients for S/C RT. Two hundred two breast conservation patients with one to three positive axillary nodes on axillary dissection treated with breast irradiation without S/C RT and 20 patients with S/C RT between August 1985 and May 2002 were identified and retrospectively evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine SCF-free and overall survival curves. ⋯ One patient with a SCF was salvaged and is disease-free at 134 months. The overall low incidence of SCF in patients with one to three positive nodes treated with breast radiation alone after breast conserving surgery and adequate axillary dissection suggests that additional S/C RT is unnecessary in this cohort. When it occurs, supraclavicular nodal failure is often associated with distant metastases.
-
Because ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) avidly expresses Her2/neu, the target of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, and because trastuzumab has been shown to be effective against invasive breast cancer, trastuzumab may be effective for reducing the tumor burden and abrogating or reversing the hypothesized transition from in situ to invasive disease in patients with DCIS. To test this hypothesis, a trial of neoadjuvant trastuzumab for DCIS has been opened at our institution. ⋯ The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) is planning a trial to test this hypothesis. The risk of cardiac toxicity associated with the doses of trastuzumab planned for these trials (cumulative doses of 8 mg/kg for our trial and 14 mg/kg in the NSABP trial) is believed to be minimal, but the safety profile of these approaches will need to be closely monitored.
-
Multicenter Study
Complete response after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplatation in metastatic breast cancer results in survival benefit.
Metastatic breast cancer is an incurable disease even with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Even though phase III studies have not shown a survival advantage for this group as a whole, it is possible that a small subset of patients may benefit from HDC/ASCT with careful patient selection. A total of 198 patients from three different institutions were treated with HDC/ASCT. ⋯ In contrast, the patients with persistent residual disease had an RFS and OS of 7 and 12 months (p < 0.001). These data show that patients achieving a CR after HDC/ASCT have a better relapse-free and OS, when compared to patients with persistent residual disease after HDC/ASCT. This study suggests that a subset of patients with residual metastatic breast cancer after standard chemotherapy can achieve CR with HDC and ASCT which may result in better long-term outcome.
-
When breast-conserving therapy was introduced at the Cancer Institute Hospital (CIH) in Tokyo in 1986, we instituted our own strategy as follows: 1) every effort is to be made for complete tumor resection while avoiding deformity of the breast, and 2) radiotherapy (RT) is applied only to the patients with positive surgical margins. This is, in turn, to clarify the group of patients in whom postoperative RT can be safely spared. Among 9670 patients operated on for primary breast cancer during the 16.5 year period from 1986 to 2002 at CIH, there were 2449 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS). ⋯ TR and SP can be further reduced to exceptionally low levels in patients who received RT despite negative margins, though it would not seem reasonable to administer RT to all of these patients because the actual number of patients who would benefit is comparatively small. From these observations, it seems that our imaging, pathologic examination, and surgical approaches for patients who are candidates for BCS have been highly valid, and our criteria for sparing postoperative RT as well as categorization of IBTR into TR and SP are quite appropriate. Although our results with BCS seem to deserve wide recognition, they are not from randomized clinical trials, so the findings must be confirmed by a study in order to investigate whether the results at CIH can be applied generally at other institutions.