Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
-
Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. · Jul 2000
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a critical risk/benefit analysis of patients in intensive care treated with R-hirudin.
Patients in intensive care may be at high risk of in vivo platelet activation because comorbid conditions, such as infections, septicemia, shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and cancer represent procoagulant states. Hyperreactivity of platelets with or without a decline of cell count may result in thromboembolic complications potentially associated with the phenomenon of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. We analyzed the data of 10 patients highly suspected of having heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during their intensive care treatment of 29 plus or minus 22 days. ⋯ The heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPAA) assay was positive in 8/10 cases, whereas the PF4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay showed a positive result in four of eight analyzed cases. In four cases, the assays were concordantly positive. The PF4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was not performed in two cases.
-
Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. · Jul 2000
Coagulation tests and anti-phospholipid antibodies in patients positive for lupus anticoagulant.
We examined activated partial thromboplastin time, kaolin clotting time, mixing with normal plasma in kaolin clotting time, dilute Russell's viper venom time, dilute Russell's viper venom time at high lipid concentrations, anti-phospholipid antibodies, and anti-cardiolipin-beta2-glycoprotein I complex antibody in 135 patients with prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time and diagnosed 86 patients positive for lupus anticoagulant. The sensitivity of activated partial thromboplastin time and dilute Russell's viper venom time/dilute Russell's viper venom time-high lipid concentrations ratio for lupus anticoagulant were markedly high, but the specificity of activated partial thromboplastin time for lupus anticoagulant was not markedly high. The specificity, but not the sensitivity, of kaolin clotting time-mixing with normal plasma in kaolin clotting time was markedly high. ⋯ Of the lupus anticoagulant-positive patients with thrombosis, 45% were positive for anti-phospholipid antibodies, 35% were positive for anti-cardiolipin-beta2-glycoprotein I complex antibody, 60% were positive for both anti-phospholipid antibodies and anti-cardiolipin-beta2-glycoprotein I complex antibody, and only 17% were negative for anti-phospholipid antibodies and anti-cardiolipin-beta2-glycoprotein I complex antibody. These findings suggest that lupus anticoagulant can be diagnosed by dilute Russell's viper venom time/dilute Russell's viper venom time-high lipid concentrations ratio, and that thrombosis in lupus anticoagulant-positive may be predictable from both anti-phospholipid antibodies and anti-cardiolipin-beta2-glycoprotein I complex antibody. Plasma tissue type plasminogen activator level in lupus anticoagulant patients was significantly increased, and plasma tissue type plasminogen activator and fibrin-D-dimer levels in lupus anticoagulant-positive patients with thrombosis were significantly higher than in those without thrombosis, suggesting that the diagnosis of thrombosis by hemostatic markers might be important in lupus anticoagulant.
-
Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. · Apr 2000
Rapid ELISA D-dimer testing in the exclusion of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.
The clinical diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) is known to be unreliable. Until now, no biological marker has been found to confirm thrombosis, but help can be gained from a biological marker ruling out the diagnosis of DVT or PE, i.e., the sensitive measurement of D-dimer (DD) species. ⋯ High clinical probability for thrombosis was encountered in 32 patients and radiology was carried out, although D-dimer was negative: none of these patients was found to have a thrombosis after radiologic examination. However, extensive progress must be made in test prescription to reduce the excessive rate of positive D-dimer tests (78%) and positive measurements that are not followed up by radiology (42%).
-
Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. · Jan 2000
ReviewExclusion and diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by a rapid ELISA D-dimer test and noninvasive imaging techniques within the context of a clinical model.
A negative rapid ELISA D-dimer test alone in out-patients with a low to moderate clinical probability (CP) on pulmonary embolism (PE) is predicted to safely exclude pulmonary embolism. The combination of a negative rapid ELISA D-dimer test and a low to moderate CP on PE followed by compression ultrasonography (CUS) for the detection of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is safe and cost-effective as it reduces the need for noninvasive imaging techniques to about 50% to 60% of outpatients with suspected PE. A high probability ventilation-perfusion (VP) scan or a positive spiral CT consistent with PE and the detection of DVT by CUS are currently considered to be clear indications for anticoagulant treatment. ⋯ Serial CUS testing for the detection of DVT in patients with a low to moderate CP on PE and a nondiagnostic VP scan or negative spiral CT is predicted to be safe and will reduce the need for PA to less than 10% or even less than 5%. This noninvasive serial CUS strategy restricts the need for invasive PA to a minor group of patients (< 5%) with the combination of a low CP on PE and high probability VP scan or the combination of a nondiagnostic VP scan or negative spiral CT and a high CP on PE. Prospective evaluations are warranted to implement and to validate the advantages and the disadvantages of the various combinations of noninvasive strategies and to compare serial CUS testing versus PA in randomized clinical management studies of outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
-
Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. · Oct 1999
ReviewInadequacy of current prevention strategies for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is one of the most difficult problems facing clinicians today. Despite recent understanding of the pathophysiology of this disorder, there are many unresolved issues about diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. In this article, difficulties physicians encounter when faced with a suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patient will be reviewed as well as our experience in 113 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia which highlights the failure of current preventive strategies for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The experience of using warfarin in 51 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia will also be reviewed.