Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
-
Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. · Mar 2003
Clinical TrialLowered-intensity preparative regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation delays acute graft-versus-host disease but does not improve outcome for advanced hematologic malignancy.
Reduced conditioning intensity has extended the option of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to patients who cannot tolerate fully myeloablative regimens. However, relapse and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) continue to be major causes of morbidity and mortality. We prospectively tested whether a moderate reduction of the intensity of the preparative regimen would lead to significant reduction in regimen-related toxicity without compromising tumor control in a cohort of 44 patients ineligible for conventional hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. ⋯ After adjusting for age and comorbidity, disease stage continued to be significantly associated with overall survival (P =.005). In conclusion, a moderate reduction in conditioning dose intensity resulted in delayed onset of acute GVHD (compared with historical controls). A reduction in conditioning intensity is associated with poor survival for patients with advanced-stage disease, highlighting the importance of the conditioning regimen for tumor control.
-
Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. · Mar 2003
Clinical TrialEstablishment of early donor engraftment after reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to potentiate the graft-versus-lymphoma effect against refractory lymphomas.
Reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), which typically results in mixed chimerism initially after transplantation, has had limited efficacy in chemotherapy-refractory lymphomas. We hypothesized that the rapid establishment of complete donor chimerism would potentiate a graft-versus-lymphoma effect. Fifteen patients with chemotherapy-refractory lymphoma initially received induction with a conventional chemotherapy regimen (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, fludarabine [EPOCH-F]) to deplete host T cells and provide disease control prior to alloHSCT. ⋯ The 1-year progression-free survival rate from time of study entry is 67% with only 1 relapse among 9 CRs. At a median potential follow-up of 28 months, the overall survival rate is 53%. These data demonstrate that a potent and durable graft-versus-lymphoma effect can occur against chemotherapy-refractory lymphomas and suggest that this effect may be associated with rapid, complete donor chimerism after reduced-intensity alloHSCT.
-
Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. · Jan 2003
Comparative StudyA comparison of related donor peripheral blood and bone marrow transplants: importance of late-onset chronic graft-versus-host disease and infections.
Peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell (PBSC) transplants have been shown to result in more rapid engraftment than standard bone marrow transplants (BMTs). Little comparative data exist regarding complications in patients receiving transplants using these stem cell sources. In our study, 97 adults with advanced hematologic malignancies who received allogeneic PBSC transplants were compared with 97 adults who received allogeneic BMTs using identical preparative regimens and support parameters. ⋯ Accompanying this "late-onset chronic GVHD," a pattern of more frequent late systemic fungal and cytomegalovirus infections was observed in PBSC transplant recipients. In conclusion, although PBSC transplant recipients engraft more quickly than BMT recipients and have somewhat better 2-year survival rates, they develop more frequent late-onset chronic GVHD and may have more late fungal and cytomegalovirus infections than marrow recipients. Further studies must examine this late-onset chronic GVHD and better characterize immune reconstitution in PBSC transplant recipients to understand their effects on patient recovery.
-
Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. · Jan 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of outcome of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) donor-marrow priming in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia.
To investigate the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) donor-marrow priming on hematopoietic recovery and clinical outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, we compared HILA-matched related marrow transplantation with and without G-CSF donor priming in a prospective randomized study for a homogeneous group of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients. Fifty patients (aged 12-41 years) with CML were enrolled in the study. Thirty-two patients (study group) received the marrow grafts primed with G-CSF at 3 to 4 micro/kg per day for 7 days prior to the marrow harvest, and 18 patients (control group) received the marrow grafts without G-CSF priming. ⋯ There were no significant differences in chronic GVHD (24% versus 33.3%), relapse rates (12.5% versus 11.1%), and overall survival rates (78.1% versus 66.7%, P = .32) between the study and control groups during a median follow-up period of 24 months (range, 6-50 months). There was, however, a trend in favor of improved chronic GVHD and disease-free survival in the study group. We conclude that G-CSF donor-marrow priming accelerates both neutrophil and platelet engraftment and is associated with a very low incidence of grades II to IV acute GVHD in CML patients after HLA-matched sibling marrow transplantation.
-
Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. · Jan 2002
Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialIntravenous versus oral busulfan as part of a busulfan/cyclophosphamide preparative regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: decreased incidence of hepatic venoocclusive disease (HVOD), HVOD-related mortality, and overall 100-day mortality.
Hepatic venoocclusive disease (HVOD) is a complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and is a well-recognized dose-limiting toxicity of oral busulfan (Bu)-based preparative regimens. The unpredictable absorption of oral Bu from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and hepatic first-pass effects have led to the development of an intravenous Bu preparation (i.v. Bu). ⋯ Bu was the strongest predictor for development of HVOD (odds ratio, 7.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-27.2; P = .002). This study showed that the incidence rate of HVOD is significantly lower (P = .002) and the 100-day survival rate significantly higher (P = .002) in patients treated with i.v. Bu than in patients treated with oral Bu when Bu is used as part of a BuCy2 preparative regimen for allogeneic HSCT.