Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
-
We describe two cases of combined fractures of the odontoid process and upper thoracic spine that have not been previously reported. The first patient, a 21-year-old man, sustained an odontoid process fracture with posterior displacement and a fracture-dislocation injury at T4/5 in a motorcycle accident. The second patient, a 66-year-old woman, fell from a cliff and sustained an odontoid process fracture with posterior displacement and a bursting fracture at T3 and T4 with rotation. ⋯ The second patient escaped neurological deficit. Both underwent anterior screw fixation of the odontoid process and posterior fusion of the upper thoracic spine. In both cases the cervical spine seemed to be in hyperextension, and the upper thoracic spine experienced sudden flexion and rotation forces.
-
The risk of accelerating the degeneration of adjacent disc levels after lumbar spinal fusion is a controversial issue. A finite element model consisting of L1 to L5 lumbar spines was used to assess the effect on adjacent disc level after lumbar spinal fusion. We compared intact, L4/5 posterior interbody fusion (PLF), and L4/5 posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) models. ⋯ The Tresca stress of the annulus fibrosus from the posterior surface of the disc to the neural foramen adjacent to the fusion level was higher than that on other nonfusion intervertebral levels; and it was higher under conditions of flexion moment loading plus compression loading [107% (1.48 PMa) in the PLF model and 112% (1.54 Mpa) in the PLIF model] than in the intact model. These findings demonstrate that with lumbar fusion, stresses on the vertebral end-plate and the annulus fibrosus were high adjacent to the fusion level; furthermore, stresses were higher in the PLIF model than in the PLF model. These results suggested that lumbar spinal fusion might bring with it a risk of damage to the annulus fibrosus and the vertebral end-plate adjacent to the fusion level.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Effects of cyclical etidronate with alfacalcidol on lumbar bone mineral density, bone resorption, and back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
The purpose of the present open-labeled, randomized, prospective study was to compare the effects of cyclical etidronate combined with alfacalcidol with those of cyclical etidronate alone on lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), bone resorption, and back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Forty postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, 60-86 years of age, without any vertebral fractures in the lumbar spine, were randomly divided into two groups with 20 patients in each group. One group was treated with cyclical etidronate (oral etidronate 200 mg daily for 2 weeks every 3 months) and the other was given cyclical etidronate combined with alfacalcidol (cyclical etidronate plus alfacalcidol 1 Ig daily continuously). ⋯ Cyclical etidronate combined with alfacalcidol significantly increased the lumbar BMD with a more significant reduction in the urinary NTX level than cyclical etidronate alone, but cyclical etidronate alone did not significantly increase the lumbar BMD. Alleviation of back pain was similar in the two groups. These results suggest that cyclical etidronate combined with alfacalcidol appears to be more useful than cyclical etidronate alone for increasing the lumbar BMD by more markedly suppressing bone resorption in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
-
The study was designed to validate a translated, culturally adapted questionnaire. We examined the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RDQ) when assessing disability in Japanese patients with low back pain. The RDQ is a reliable, validated scale used to measure disability caused by low back pain. ⋯ The principal component analysis showed unidimensionality. The RDQ score of the 133 patients was significantly improved after treatment. The Japanese version of the RDQ is a useful scale that is easy to use with reliability, validity, and responsiveness when assessing patients with low back pain.
-
Case Reports
Computed tomography-guided screw fixation of a sacroiliac joint dislocation fracture: a case report.
A 19-year-old woman sustained a vertical shear type pelvic fracture. Sacroiliac fixation using computed tomography (CT)-guided cannulated screws was performed for a left sacroiliac dislocation fracture, and a satisfactory result was obtained over time. ⋯ Advantages of CT-guided sacroiliac screw fixation include precise evaluation of the degree of reduction and absence of nerve and vascular damage during the time the screw is inserted into the sacral body. This procedure is a useful, safe method owing to its minimal invasiveness in patients with unstable pelvic fractures that are reducible by manual manipulation or traction.