Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
-
In response to calls to increase patient involvement in health professions education (HPE), educators are inviting patients to play a range of roles in the teaching of clinical trainees. However, there are concerns that patients involved in educational programs are seen as representing a demographic larger than themselves: their disease, their social group or even patients as a whole. ⋯ Just as clinical experts are involved in HPE to share their expertise and represent their clinical experience, so too should patients be invited to participate in HPE explicitly for their expertise in their illness experience. This framing clarifies the goals of patient involvement as technocratic rather than tokenistic, mandates meaningful contributions by patients, and helps frame patient involvement for learners as the presentation of expert perspectives.
-
Stigma has been associated with delays in seeking treatment, avoiding clinical encounters, prolonged risk of transmission, poor adherence to treatment, mental distress, mental ill health and an increased risk of the recurrence of health problems, among many other factors that negatively impact on health outcomes. While the burdens and consequences of stigma have long been recognized in the health literature, there remains some ambiguity about how stigma is experienced by individuals who live with it. ⋯ Understanding the experiential features, or phenomenology, of shame anxiety will give healthcare professionals a greater sensitivity to stigma and its impacts in clinical settings and encounters. I will conclude by suggesting that 'shame-sensitive' practice would be beneficial in healthcare.
-
Despite medical guidelines delineating respect towards patients, many encounters between patients and clinicians are problematic, in which patients feel disrespected, unheard, shamed or abused. This article uses an anthropological lens to focus on the imbrication of humour and humiliation as forms of shame and obstetric violence within obstetric encounters. Humour as a form of speech play creates a substrate for the occurrence of humiliation and shaming of obstetric patients. ⋯ Humour and humiliation were centrally present within these interactions. Ultimately, both humour and humiliation functioned as shaming mechanisms that increased the presence of obstetric violence in these encounters. The article examines whether an understanding of shame can improve clinical practice and concludes with implications to clinical practice.
-
Bias is an ambiguous term, defined in different ways. In conventional usage, it indicates unwarranted prejudice. However, in health research, the notion that bias is invariably bad is biased. ⋯ Thus, health researchers need to bring their biases to consciousness. A dialectical approach can then engage the biases as conversational partners to innovate health policy that is informed by principles including transparency, good faith and tolerance. Less critical than whether researchers are biased is whose interests their bias serves given their positionality and role.
-
Recent controversies about dietary advice concerning meat demonstrate that aggregating the available evidence to assess a putative causal link between food and cancer is a challenging enterprise. ⋯ We find that E-Synthesis is a tool well-suited for food carcinogenicity assessments, as it enables a graphical representation of lines and weights of evidence, offers the possibility to make a great number of judgements explicit and transparent, outputs a probability of causality suitable for decision making and is flexible to aggregate different kinds of evidence.