Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors
-
Most Emergency Medical Services (EMS) protocols require spine immobilization with both a cervical collar and long spine board for patients with suspected spine injuries. The goal of this research was to determine the prevalence of unstable thoracolumbar spine injuries among patients receiving prehospital spine immobilization: a 4-year retrospective review of adult subjects who received prehospital spine immobilization and were transported to a trauma center. Prehospital and hospital records were linked. ⋯ No unstable injuries were found among the 951 subjects who were immobilized following ground level falls. Hospital providers ordered at least one spine x-ray or CT in most patients, and a thoracolumbar imaging in half of all patients immobilized. Only 0.5% of patients who received prehospital spine immobilization had an unstable thoracolumbar spine injury.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Comparison of Fentanyl and Morphine in the Prehospital Treatment of Ischemic Type Chest Pain.
In the treatment of acute coronary syndromes, reduction of sympathetic stress and catecholamine release is an important therapeutic goal. One method used to achieve this goal is pain reduction through the systemic administration of analgesia. Historically, morphine has been the analgesic of choice in ischemic cardiac pain. ⋯ There were no significant differences between the changes in visual analog scores and numeric rating scale scores for pain between the two groups (p = 0.16 and p = 0.15, respectively). This study supports that fentanyl and morphine are comparable in providing analgesia for ischemic-type chest pain. Fentanyl appears to be a safe and effective alternative to morphine for the management of chest pain in the prehospital setting.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Pilot Study Examining the Effects of Atropine on Performance during Uncompensable Heat Stress.
In many operational scenarios, hypohydration can be corrected with oral rehydration following the work interval. Although rare, there are potential situations that require extended intervals of uncompensable heat stress exposure while working in personal protective equipment (PPE). Under these conditions, retention of body water may be valuable to preserve work capacity and reduce cardiovascular strain. We conducted a pilot study comparing intramuscular atropine sulfate versus saline placebo to establish the safety profile of the protocol and to provide pilot data for future investigations. Five, healthy, heat-acclimated subjects completed this crossover design laboratory study. Each subject performed up to one hour of exertion in a hot environment while wearing a chemical resistant coverall. Atropine sulfate (0.02 mg/kg) or an equivalent volume of sterile saline was administered by intramuscular injection. Core temperature, heart rate, perceptual measures, and changes in body mass were measured. All five subjects completed the acclimation period and both protocols. No adverse events occurred, and no pharmacologically induced delirium was identified. Change in body mass was less following exercise influenced by atropine sulfate (p = 0.002). Exertion time tended to be longer in the atropine sulfate arm (p = 0.08). Other measures appeared similar between groups. Intramuscular atropine sulfate reduced sweating and tended to increase the work interval under uncompensable heat stress when compared to saline placebo. Heart rate and temperature changes during exertion were similar in both conditions suggesting that the influence of an anticholinergic agent on thermoregulation may be minimal during uncompensable heat stress. ⋯ thermoregulation; cholinolytic; anticholinergic; reaction time.
-
Multicenter Study Observational Study
Lights and Siren Transport and the Need for Hospital Intervention in Trauma Patients.
Emergent ambulance transportation is associated with increased risk of collision, injury, and death for EMS professionals, patients, and the general public. Time saved using lights and siren (L&S) is typically small, and often provides minimal clinical benefit. Our objective was to investigate the frequency of L&S transports, describe the precision of the decision to employ L&S to predict the need for a time critical hospital intervention (TCHI) within 15 minutes of hospital arrival, identify clinical predictors of a TCHI, and compare clinical outcomes in patients transported by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) with and without L&S in a trauma-specific population. ⋯ Among patients that received a TCHI, over a third that were transported with L&S (36.8%) expired, compared with two of 14 patients (14.3%) not transported L&S. EMS professionals in this study demonstrated a high ability to discern which trauma patients did not require L&S. Nevertheless, L&S transport resulted in a TCHI less than one quarter of the time, suggesting an opportunity for further reduction of L&S transports in trauma patients.
-
Case Reports
Differences in Paramedic Fatigue before and after Changing from a 24-hour to an 8-hour Shift Schedule: A Case Report.
Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians often work 24-hour shifts. There is a growing body of literature, with an elevated level of concern among EMS leaders that longer shifts contribute to fatigued workers and negative safety outcomes. However, many questions remain about shift length, fatigue, and outcomes. ⋯ He also reported perceived fatigue, sleepiness, and difficulty with concentration at the beginning, every 4 hours during, and at the end of scheduled shifts, for a total of ten 24-hour shifts and twenty-four 8-hour shifts. We discuss differences in measures taken before and after switching shift schedules, and highlight differences in fatigue, sleepiness, and difficulty with concentration taken at the end of all 34 scheduled shifts stratified by shift duration (24 hours versus 8 hours). Findings from this case report present a unique opportunity to 1) observe and analyze a phenomenon that has not been investigated in great detail in the EMS setting; and 2) address an issue of significance to employers and EMS clinicians alike.