Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors
-
The emergency department (ED) poses challenges to effective handoff from emergency medical services (EMS) personnel to ED staff. Despite the importance of a complete and accurate patient handoff report between EMS and trauma staff, communication is often interrupted, incomplete, or otherwise ineffective. The Mechanism of injury/Medical Complaint, Injuries or Inspections head to toe, vital Signs, and Treatments (MIST) report initiative was implemented to standardize the handoff process. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether documentation of prehospital care in the inpatient medical record improved after MIST implementation. ⋯ The use of the standardized MIST tool for EMS to hospital patient handoff was associated with a mixed value on inpatient documentation of prehospital events. After MIST implementation, agreement was higher for mechanism and location of injury and lower for vital signs and treatments. Further research can advance the prehospital to treatment facility handoff process.
-
Hemorrhage is one of the leading causes of preventable death in both military and civilian trauma. Implementation of items such as tourniquets and hemostatic dressings are helpful in controlling hemorrhage and increasing the survival rate of casualties when such injuries occur. Prehospital blood transfusions are used to treat patients with severe injuries where the standard methods of hemorrhage control are not an effective form of treatment. There is limited research and no widely accepted protocol on pediatric prehospital blood transfusions. ⋯ Prehospital administration of blood products occurred infrequently within this pediatric dataset, but those that received blood were critically injured with most receiving a massive transfusion. Given the frequency with which medical personnel are carrying blood products in the prehospital, combat setting, guidelines specific to pediatric administration would be beneficial.
-
Multicenter Study
The value of prehospital early warning scores to predict in - hospital clinical deterioration: a multicenter, observational base-ambulance study.
Early warning scores are clinical tools capable of identifying prehospital patients with high risk of deterioration. We sought here to contrast the validity of seven early warning scores in the prehospital setting and specifically, to evaluate the predictive value of each score to determine early deterioration-risk during the hospital stay, including mortality at one, two, three and seven- days since the index event. Methods: A prospective multicenter observational based-ambulance study of patients treated by six advanced life support emergency services and transferred to five Spanish hospitals between October 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019. ⋯ Conclusions: All the analyzed scores have a good predictive capacity for early mortality, and no statistically significant differences between them were found. The National Early Warning Score 2, at the clinical level, has certain advantages. Early warning scores are clinical tools that can help in the complex decision-making processes during critical moments, so their use should be generalized in all emergency medical services.
-
Pediatric seizures commonly trigger emergency medical services (EMS) activation and account for approximately 5-15% of all pediatric 911-EMS calls. More than 50% of children with active seizure activity do not receive prehospital antiepileptic drugs, potentially because they are not recognized by EMS. The purpose of this study is to evaluate specificity and sensitivity of paramedic identification of pediatric seizures and to describe the characteristics of unrecognized seizures. ⋯ Paramedics were highly specific, but not sensitive in identifying active seizures on ED arrival. Patients with unrecognized seizures presented most commonly with abnormal vital signs and gaze deviation.
-
We validated the NUE rule, using three criteria (Non-shockable initial rhythm, Unwitnessed arrest, Eighty years or older) to predict futile resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). ⋯ In external validation, the NUE rule (Non-shockable initial rhythm, Unwitnessed arrest, Eighty years or older) correctly identified 7.2% of OHCA patients unlikely to survive to hospital discharge. The NUE rule could be used in EMS protocols and policies to identify OHCA patients very unlikely to benefit from aggressive resuscitation.