Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors
-
Objective: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) in schools and universities are uncommon. However, these institutions must plan and prepare for such events to ensure the best outcomes. To evaluate their preparedness we assessed baseline characteristics, survival outcomes and 12-year trends for OHCA in schools/universities compared to other public locations. ⋯ However, after adjustment for favorable cardiac arrest factors, such as younger age, bystander CPR and PAD, survival was similar between schools/universities and public locations. Conclusion: The majority of OHCA in schools and universities were witnessed and received bystander CPR, however less than half received PAD. Developing site-specific cardiac emergency response plans and providing age appropriate CPR training to primary, secondary and university students would help improve PAD rates.
-
Background: The EMS Practice Analysis provides a vision of current prehospital care by defining the work performed by EMS professionals. In this manuscript, we present the National Advanced Life Support (ALS) EMS Practice Analysis for the advanced EMT (AEMT) and paramedic levels of certification. The goal of the 2019 EMS Practice Analysis is to define the work performed by EMS professionals and present a new template for future practice analyses. ⋯ Conclusion: The 2019 ALS Practice Analysis describes prehospital practice at the AEMT and paramedic levels. This approach allows for a detailed and robust evaluation of EMS care while focusing on each task conducted at each level of certification in EMS. The data can be leveraged to inform the scope of practice, educational standards, and assist in validating the ALS levels of the certification examination.
-
Observational Study
Characteristics of nontrauma patients receiving prehospital blood transfusion with the same triggers as trauma patients: A retrospective observational cohort study.
Objective: While prehospital blood transfusion (PHBT) for trauma patients has been established in many services, the literature on PHBT use for nontrauma patients is limited. We aimed to describe and compare nontrauma and trauma patients receiving PHBT who had similar hemodynamic triggers. Methods: We analyzed 3.5 years of registry data from a single prehospital critical care unit. ⋯ On admission, the nontrauma patients had lower hemoglobin (median 95 [84-119] vs 124 [108-133], p < 0.0001), higher pH (median 7.40 [7.27-7.44] vs 7.30 [7.19-7.36], p = 0.0015) and lower plasma thromboplastin time (median 55 [45-81] vs 72 [58-86], p = 0.0261) than the trauma patients. Conclusions: We identified four nontrauma patient groups in need of PHBT, and the patients appeared to be seriously ill. Efficacy of prehospital transfusion in nontrauma patients should be evaluated futher in becoming studies.