British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of a bupivacaine-clonidine mixture with plain bupivacaine for caudal analgesia in children.
In a randomized, double-blind study in children undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery, we have assessed the clinical value of combining clonidine with bupivacaine for caudal analgesia. Forty-six children, aged 1-10 yr, were allocated randomly to two equal groups to receive 0.25% bupivacaine 1 ml kg-1 combined with either normal saline 1 ml (group A) or clonidine 2 micrograms kg-1 in normal saline 1 ml (group B). Mean (SD) duration of caudal analgesia for groups A and B were 5.2 (1.2) h and 9.8 (2.1) h, respectively (P < 0.0001). ⋯ There was no significant difference in the incidence of side effects between the two groups. The longer duration of sedation in group B (9.1 (2.5) h) resulted partly from the sedative effect of clonidine and partly from the longer duration of analgesia provided by clonidine. We conclude that, when added to bupivacaine, clonidine improves the efficacy of caudal analgesia in children.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Changes in haemodynamic variables during transurethral resection of the prostate: comparison of general and spinal anaesthesia.
We have compared changes in haemodynamic variables before and during transurethral resection of the prostate in 22 patients under general or spinal anaesthesia. In the general anaesthetic group there was a significant decrease in cardiac output (mean 32% (SEM 5%)) and mean arterial pressure (14% (3%)) after induction of anaesthesia and a significant decrease (27% (3%)) in heart rate before the start of resection. ⋯ We conclude that with both these anaesthetic techniques the greatest changes in haemodynamic variables occurred shortly after induction, and that these changes were greater during general than spinal anaesthesia. The resection period was not associated with significant haemodynamic changes.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Effects of isoflurane-nitrous oxide and halothane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia on myocardial contractility assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography.
In order to evaluate the direct effect of isoflurane-nitrous oxide and halothane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia on cardiac contractility in 20 adults, we have used a method based on left ventricular end-systolic wall stress (LVESWS) vs velocity of circumferential fibre shortening with corrected heart rate (Vcfc), obtained by transoesophageal echocardiography. We found that LVESWS (index of afterload) decreased significantly with isoflurane-nitrous oxide (n = 10) in concentrations of 1.5-1.95 MAC, but there were no significant changes in LVESWS with halothane-nitrous oxide (n = 10). ⋯ In the analysis of the LVESWS-Vcfc relationship, myocardial contractility associated with isoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia did not differ significantly from that associated with halothane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia at equiMAC concentrations. The results suggest that halothane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia, at 1.5-1.95 MAC, maintained myocardial contractility in similar anaesthetic concentrations to isoflurane-nitrous oxide.