British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Effect of systemic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist (dextromethorphan) on primary and secondary hyperalgesia in humans.
Dextromethorphan is a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist known to inhibit wind-up and central hyperexcitability of dorsal horn neurones. We studied 24 healthy, unmedicated male volunteers, aged 21-28 yr, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Burn injuries were produced on the medial surface of the dominant calf with a 25 x 50 mm rectangular thermode. ⋯ Side effects were frequent but clinically acceptable. The effects of dextromethorphan were in agreement with experimental studies indicating that dextromethorphan is a NMDA receptor antagonist. The effects of dextromethorphan in the burn injury model were similar to those of ketamine and distinct from those of local anaesthetics and opioids.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Differential effects of nitrous oxide and propofol on myogenic transcranial motor evoked responses during sufentanil anaesthesia.
We have compared the effects of 50% nitrous oxide and propofol, each administered concurrently with sufentanil, on the amplitudes and latencies of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) response to transcranial electrical stimulation. Using a crossover design, 12 patients undergoing spinal surgery were exposed to both 50% nitrous oxide and propofol, the latter in a bolus-infusion regimen. Six patients received nitrous oxide first and six received propofol first. ⋯ With single pulse stimulation, median CMAP amplitude was significantly greater during administration of nitrous oxide than propofol (nitrous oxide 335 (10th-90th percentiles 35-849) microV; propofol 36 (0-251) microV) (P < 0.01). With paired stimulation, there was no significant difference in CMAP amplitude during the two regimens (nitrous oxide 1031 (296-1939) microV; propofol 655 (0-1867) microV). The results indicate that propofol caused more depression of transcranial electrical motor evoked responses than 50% nitrous oxide but that the difference was probably clinically unimportant when a paired stimulation paradigm was used.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Knee-chest vs horizontal side position during induction of spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing lumbar disc surgery.
In the prone knee-chest position the spread of plain 0.5% bupivacaine in the cerebrospinal fluid and associated haemodynamic changes may be different compared with the horizontal position. A randomized comparison was performed in 40 ASA I-II patients, aged 24-61 yr, undergoing lumbar disc surgery. Subarachnoid injection (27-gauge needle) at the L2-3 interspace with 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine was performed with the patient in the operative knee-chest position (prone knee-chest group, n = 20) or in the horizontal side position (supine side horizontal group, n = 20). ⋯ Four of the latter patients also required administration of an anticholinergic for bradycardia compared with two patients in the supine side horizontal group. Light sedation was given to five patients in the prone knee-chest group and to four in the supine side horizontal group because of numbness and aching in the shoulders. We conclude that spinal block was similar in the two groups but there was a tendency to more frequent episodes of haemodynamic deterioration in the knee-chest position.