British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of epidural bolus administration of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.1% bupivacaine with 0.0002% fentanyl for analgesia during labour.
We have compared analgesia during labour provided by two epidural drug regimens, in a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Group A received 10-ml bolus doses of 0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 micrograms ml-1 while group B received 0.25% plain bupivacaine 10 ml. ⋯ Duration of labour and time from insertion of the epidural to delivery was similar in both groups, but in group A, duration of the second stage was significantly shorter (P = 0.0003; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.17, -0.27 h) and the incidence of forceps delivery was lower (P = 0.032). Maternal satisfaction with epidural analgesia, as assessed by VAS, was higher in group A (P = 0.04; 95% CI -0.001, 10.001).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Remifentanil prevents an increase in intraocular pressure after succinylcholine and tracheal intubation.
We have studied changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) in 30 patients after succinylcholine (suxamethonium) and tracheal intubation following administration of propofol 2 mg kg-1 and either remifentanil 1 microgram kg-1 (group R) or saline (group S). IOP was measured before induction, before administration of succinylcholine and the study drug, before intubation and for every 1 min after intubation for 5 min. There was a significant decrease in IOP in group R compared with group S from the time of administration of the study drugs to the end of the study (P < 0.006).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with ropivacaine after major shoulder surgery: PCIA vs PCA.
We have compared the efficacy of patient-controlled interscalene analgesia (PCIA) using ropivacaine with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using nicomorphine in 60 patients (n = 30 in each group), in a prospective, randomized study. In both groups, all patients received interscalene block with 0.75% ropivacaine before induction of anaesthesia. Six hours after interscalene block, patients in group PCIA received continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at a rate of 5 ml h-1 with a bolus dose of 3 or 4 ml and a lockout time of 20 min; patients in group PCA received continuous infusion of nicomorphine 0.5 mg h-1 and a bolus dose of 2 or 3 mg with a lockout time of 20 min. ⋯ Nausea and pruritus occurred significantly more frequently in group PCA. Patient satisfaction was greater in group PCIA. We conclude that the use of 0.2% ropivacaine using PCIA was an efficient way of managing pain after major shoulder surgery and compared favourably with PCA nicomorphine in terms of pain relief, side effects and patient satisfaction.
-
Muscarinic acetylcholine signalling plays major roles in regulation of consciousness, cognitive functioning, pain perception and circulatory homeostasis. Halothane has been shown to inhibit m1 muscarinic signalling. However, no comparative data are available for desflurane, sevoflurane or isoflurane, nor have the anaesthetic effects on the m3 subtype (which is also prominent in the brain) been studied. ⋯ Absence of interference with AT1A signalling and intracellular pathways suggest that the effects of anaesthetics on muscarinic signalling most likely result from interactions with the m1 or m3 receptor molecule. Multiple interaction sites with different affinities may explain the biphasic response to desflurane. Anaesthetic-specific effects on closely related receptor subtypes suggest defined sites of action for volatile anaesthetics on the receptor protein.
-
Sevoflurane uptake (Vsevo) can be predicted by the square root of time model or the four-compartment model. However, Vsevo and the effect of cardiac output on anaesthetic uptake have not been quantified clinically. After obtaining IRB approval and informed consent, 34 adult patients received closed-circuit anaesthesia with sevoflurane for 1 h. ⋯ The rate of sevoflurane uptake decreased less than predicted by the square root of time and four-compartment models, even when measured cardiac output was used in the formulae. These findings confirm that the square root of time and four-compartment models do not accurately predict anaesthetic uptake. In addition, uptake of sevoflurane cannot be predicted by patient characteristics but was higher in patients with a higher cardiac output.