British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Ketorolac, diclofenac and ketoprofen are equally efficacious for pain relief after total hip replacement surgery.
We have compared the efficacy of ketorolac 30 mg i.v. followed by infusion at a rate of 90 mg/15.5 h, with that of diclofenac 75 mg followed by infusion of 75 mg/15.5 h or ketoprofen 100 mg followed by infusion of 100 mg/15.5 h, on postoperative pain in 85 patients after hip replacement surgery under spinal anaesthesia in a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. Supplementary analgesia was administered during the 16-h postoperative period with bolus doses of fentanyl delivered by a patient-controlled analgesia system. ⋯ Median VAS scores were low over the entire study in each group and there was no significant difference between groups. No serious adverse events were recorded.
-
Meta Analysis
A qualitative systematic review of incisional local anaesthesia for postoperative pain relief after abdominal operations.
In a qualitative systematic review, we have evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCT) of incisional local anaesthesia compared with placebo or no treatment in the control of postoperative pain after open abdominal operations. Twenty-six studies with data from 1211 patients were considered appropriate for analysis. Five RCT considered inguinal herniotomy, four hysterectomy, eight cholecystectomy and nine studies a variety of surgical procedures. ⋯ Five of the cholecystectomy studies showed significant differences but questionable clinical importance and validity in three. In various other procedures results were inconsistent and in some of minor clinical importance. Except for herniotomy, there was a lack of evidence for effect of incisional local anaesthesia on postoperative pain and further standardized studies are needed before recommendations can be made.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Effect of preoperative extradural bupivacaine and morphine on stump sensation in lower limb amputees.
We have examined the effect of preoperative extradural bupivacaine and morphine on postoperative stump sensation in 31 patients undergoing amputation of the lower limb in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients were allocated randomly to one of two groups: group 1 received extradural 0.25% bupivacaine 4-7 ml h-1 and morphine 0.16-0.28 ml h-1 before and during operation; group 2 received extradural saline before and during amputation and conventional analgesics for pain treatment. All patients received general anaesthesia for the amputation and extradural bupivacaine and morphine after operation. ⋯ The following were measured: pressure pain thresholds (pressure algometry), touch and pain detection thresholds (von Frey hairs), thermal sensibility (thermal rolls), and allodynia and wind-up-like pain. There were no differences between the two groups at any of the postoperative assessments for mechanical and thermal sensibility or rate of allodynia and wind-up-like pain. Our study suggests that preoperative and intraoperative extradural block had no long-term prophylactic effect on hyperalgesia, allodynia or wind-up-like pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Influence of timing of morphine administration on postoperative pain and analgesic consumption.
We have investigated if a pre-emptive dose of morphine, given 30 min before skin incision, influenced postoperative pain and morphine consumption after hysterectomy. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study, patients received morphine 0.3 mg kg-1 at induction of anaesthesia or 30 min later at skin incision. The primary endpoint was defined as 24-h morphine consumption via patient-controlled analgesia. We could not demonstrate any difference between the two groups in morphine consumption or pain scores, and we conclude that there was no evidence of pre-emptive analgesia in this study.