British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Effects of fentanyl, alfentanil, remifentanil and sufentanil on loss of consciousness and bispectral index during propofol induction of anaesthesia.
The bispectral index (BIS) and a sedation score were used to determine and compare the effect of propofol in the presence of fentanyl, alfentanil, remifentanil and sufentanil. Seventy-five non-premedicated patients were assigned randomly into five groups (15 in each) to receive fentanyl, alfentanil, remifentanil, sufentanil or placebo. Opioids were administered using a target-con-trolled infusion device, to obtain the following predicted effect-site concentrations: fentanyl, 1.5 ng ml(-1); alfentanil, 100 ng ml(-1); remifentanil, 6 ng ml(-1); and sufentanil, 0.2 ng ml(-1). ⋯ The relationship between propofol effect-site concentration and BIS was preserved with or without opioids. In the presence of an opioid, LOC occurred at a lower effect-site concentration of propofol and at a higher BIS50 (i.e. the BIS value associated with 50% probability of LOC), compared with placebo. Although clinically the hypnotic effect of propofol is enhanced by analgesic concentrations of mu-agonist opioids, the BIS does not show this increased hypnotic effect.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Small-dose selective spinal anaesthesia for short-duration outpatient gynaecological laparoscopy: recovery characteristics compared with propofol anaesthesia.
A randomized controlled trial compared recovery characteristics after selective spinal anaesthesia (SSA) or propofol general anaesthesia (GA) for short-duration outpatient laparoscopic surgery. Forty women were randomized to receive either SSA (1% lidocaine 10 mg, sufentanil 10 microg and sterile water 1.8 ml) or GA (propofol and nitrous oxide 50% in oxygen). Compared with the GA group, times to leaving the operating room, performing a straight leg raise, performing deep knee-bends and achieving an Aldrete score >9 and the time in Phase II recovery were significantly shorter (P < 0.05) in the SSA group.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Analgesic efficacy of tramadol 2 mg kg(-1) for paediatric day-case adenoidectomy.
We studied the analgesic efficacy of tramadol 2 mg kg(-1) for post-operative analgesia after day-case adenoidectomy in children aged 1-3 yr. Eighty children were allocated randomly to receive tramadol 2 mg kg(-1) i.v. or placebo immediately after induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was induced with alfentanil 10 microg kg(-1) and propofol 4 mg kg(-1) followed by mivacurium 0.2 mg kg(-1) for tracheal intubation. ⋯ Forty-five per cent of children receiving tramadol did not require post-operative analgesia at all compared with 15% of children receiving placebo (P = 0.003). Recovery times and the incidence of adverse effects were similar in the two groups in the recovery room and at home. The requirement for rectal ibuprofen at home did not differ between groups.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Antinociceptive properties of neurosteroids IV: pilot study demonstrating the analgesic effects of alphadolone administered orally to humans.
Fourteen patients scheduled for orthopaedic knee reconstruction surgery were enrolled in a prospective, double-blind, randomized study in which they received alphadolone (25-500 mg, n = 9) or placebo (lactose, n = 5) given orally 1 h after operation. All the subjects received a standardized general anaesthetic and the same type of surgery followed by physiotherapy using a continuous passive movement machine. Morphine was administered intravenously after operation by patient-controlled analgesia. ⋯ The experiences of these side-effects were all rated as none, mild or moderate. Orally administered alphadolone caused statistically significant reductions in morphine use and simultaneous highly significant reductions in pain scores. We conclude that alphadolone is a useful analgesic in humans when given by the oral route.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intrapartum epidural catheter migration: a comparative study of three dressing applications.
We compared three types of catheter fixation application for their ability to minimize the incidence and magnitude of epidural catheter movement during labour. Patients were randomized to have their epidural catheter secured by a Tegaderm dressing (group T; n = 35), a Tegaderm dressing plus filter-shoulder fixation (group F; n = 39), or a Niko Epi-Fix dressing (group N; n = 37). ⋯ Outward movement of the catheter was greatest when a Niko Epi-Fix was used (P < 0.01). Concerning minimization of displacement of the epidural catheter per se, only a Tegaderm dressing with additional filter-shoulder fixation proved more effective than using a Niko Epi-Fix dressing (P < 0.05).