British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Early recovery after remifentanil-pronounced compared with propofol-pronounced total intravenous anaesthesia for short painful procedures.
We compared recovery from high-dose propofol/low-dose remifentanil ('propofol-pronounced') compared with high-dose remifentanil/low-dose propofol ('remifentanil-pronounced') anaesthesia. ⋯ In patients having short painful surgery, less propofol does not give faster recovery as long as the same anaesthetic level (as indicated by BIS and clinical signs) is maintained by more remifentanil. However, recovery times were less variable following remifentanil-pronounced anaesthesia suggesting a more predictable recovery.
-
Physostigmine, a centrally acting anticholinesterase, antagonizes the hypnotic effect of propofol, as shown by the return of consciousness (response to commands) or wakefulness (spontaneous eye-opening without response to commands) and by recovery of auditory evoked potentials (40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR)) and the bispectral index (BIS). We measured the effects of physostigmine on the hypnotic effect of inhaled volatile anaesthetics, using sevoflurane as the representative agent. ⋯ Physostigmine can antagonize, at least partially, the hypnotic effect of sevoflurane and changes in arousal after physostigmine are shown by ASSR measurements. However, the antagonism is not as clear or reliable as with propofol.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Cost-effectiveness of three combinations of antiemetics in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
This study compares the cost-effectiveness of three combinations of antiemetics in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). ⋯ Ondansetron+droperidol is cheaper and at least as effective as ondansetron+ dexamethasone, and it is more effective than dexamethasone+droperidol with a reasonable extra cost.
-
There is compelling evidence that preconditioning occurs in humans. Experimental studies with potential clinical implications as well as clinical studies evaluating ischaemic, pharmacological and anaesthetic cardiac preconditioning in the perioperative setting are reviewed. These studies reveal promising results. ⋯ In addition, many anaesthetics and a significant number of perioperatively administered drugs affect the activity of cardiac sarcolemmal and mitochondrial K(ATP) channels, the end-effectors of cardiac preconditioning, and thereby markedly modulate preconditioning effects in myocardial tissue. Although these modulatory effects on K(ATP) channels have been investigated almost exclusively in laboratory investigations, they may have potential implications in clinical medicine. Important questions regarding the clinical utility and applicability of perioperative cardiac preconditioning remain unresolved and need more experimental work and randomized controlled clinical trials.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Randomized trial of novel tetracaine patch to provide local anaesthesia in neonates undergoing venepuncture.
Procedures such as venepuncture or heel prick are painful and may cause considerable stress to newborn infants. Topical local anaesthetics are effective for venepuncture but need to be applied for at least 60 min and the delivered dose will vary. We assessed a novel tetracaine-based self-adhesive patch in providing controlled local anaesthesia before venepuncture. ⋯ The tetracaine patch produced effective pain relief during the venepuncture procedure in both term and pre-term infants. There were no adverse effects, either local or systemic.