British journal of anaesthesia
-
Review
Non-technical skills of anaesthetic assistants in the perioperative period: a literature review.
Non-technical skills (NTS), which include communication, teamwork, leadership, decision-making, and situation awareness, are important in the maintenance of patient safety. NTS frameworks have been developed for anaesthetists, surgeons, and scrub practitioners. Most studies of NTS in operating theatres to date have focused on anaesthetists and surgeons. ⋯ Communication and situation awareness were described in three papers, teamwork and decision-making in two, and leadership in one. This search did not reveal any comprehensive description of the NTS required by anaesthetic assistants. The benefits of developing an NTS taxonomy for anaesthetic assistants are discussed.
-
Anaesthetic training in the UK has recently experienced significant organizational and politically driven changes. This article examines the effects these changes may have had on the training of anaesthetists and concludes that despite the introduction of changed working patterns and reduced hours over the past decade, academic and professional standards appear to have been maintained, but at the expense of reduced confidence among some trainees. ⋯ While this is clearly important, it understates the added value of consolidation and experience based on repeated exposure. Trainer and trainee surveys suggest that due to perceived service pressures, and worries about patient safety or clinical governance, this important latter stage in professional development is increasingly being omitted from the training programme.
-
The decision of where to start a research project has been influenced by many factors over the years. Tradition has a large impact, but the individual researchers' or clinicians' personal interest has also played a major role. The pharmaceutical industries' interest has without doubt initiated and sponsored many projects in order to get new products onto the market. ⋯ One way of 'mapping' the evidence in order to find out what we know and what we do not know is the production of systematic reviews. Although systematic reviews are considered top of the evidence hierarchy, they are not flawless. The aim of this article is to explain the systematic review and point to some of the challenges in the development and use of systematic reviews.