British journal of anaesthesia
-
Procedural sedation is practised by a heterogeneous group of practitioners working in a wide array of settings. However, there are currently no accepted standards for the competencies a sedation practitioner should have, the content of sedation training programmes, and guidelines for credentialing. The multidisciplinary International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation sought to develop a consensus statement on the following: which competencies should medical or dental practitioners have for procedural sedation and how are they obtained, assessed, maintained, and privileged. ⋯ Following an iterative Delphi review method, final consensus was reached. Using multispeciality consensus, we defined procedural sedation competence by identifying a set of core competencies in the domains of knowledge, skills, and attitudes across physical safety, effectiveness, psychological safety, and deliberate practice. In addition, we present a standardised framework for competency-based training and credentialing of procedural sedation practitioners.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Association between driving pressure-guided ventilation and postoperative pulmonary complications in surgical patients: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.
Prior studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the association between driving pressure-guided ventilation and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). We aimed to investigate whether driving pressure-guided ventilation is associated with a lower risk of PPCs. ⋯ INPLASY 202410068.
-
Editorial Review
Predictive modelling for postoperative acute kidney injury: big data enhancing quality or the Emperor's new clothes?
The increased availability of large clinical datasets together with increasingly sophisticated computing power has facilitated development of numerous risk prediction models for various adverse perioperative outcomes, including acute kidney injury (AKI). The rationale for developing such models is straightforward. ⋯ Some of the purported benefits of predictive modelling, particularly when applied to postoperative AKI, might not fare well under detailed scrutiny. Future research should address existing limitations and seek to demonstrate both benefit to patients and value to healthcare systems from implementation of these models in clinical practice.
-
Numerous models have been developed to predict acute kidney injury (AKI) after noncardiac surgery, yet there is a lack of independent validation and comparison among them. ⋯ We identified three models with fair discrimination and potential clinical utility after recalibration for assessing the risk of acute kidney injury after noncardiac surgery.
-
Letter Observational Study
Ketonaemia during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: a prospective observational study.