Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
-
Objectives To retrospectively analyze by indices of success, patients with chronic complex pain, including, axial low back pain, receiving dual spinal cord stimulation (SCS) systems. Methods Eighteen patients with dual spinal cord stimulators have been retrospectively and nonrandomly analyzed. The preponderance of patients in our study group had failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). ⋯ Thirteen (81%) patients with dual lead SCS therapy were willing to repeat the SCS implant procedure. Complications occurred in 43.7%. Conclusions Dual spinal cord stimulation is appropriate and efficacious for treating complex pathology and complex pain that including pain of the low, axial back.
-
Objective To compare the technical performance of different percutaneous lead types for spinal cord stimulation. Methods Using the ut-scs software (University of Twente's spinal cord stimulation), lead models having similar characteristics such as the 3487A PISCES-Quad (PQ), 3887 PISCES-Quad Compact (PC), 3888 PISCES-Quad Plus (PP) (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN), and the AB SC2108 (AB) (Advanced Bionics Corp., Valencia, CA) were simulated in monopolar and tripolar (guarded cathode) combinations on a single lead, placed just outside the dorsal dura mater and both centered on the spinal cord midline, and at 1 mm lateral. The influence of displacing a lead dorsally in the epidural fat was examined as well. ⋯ Conclusions Complex pain syndromes are treated best with lead having a small contact spacing, being programmed as a tripole (guarded cathode) and centered on the spinal cord midline just outside the dura mater. This is because dorsal column fiber recruitment is more extensive than with any other combinations, including dual leads. Improved recruitment of dorsal column fibers is accompanied by increased energy consumption.
-
The present experiments were performed on rat colon to study neurogenic and myogenic elicited propulsion induced by 0.3 and 30 msec long current pulses. The colon segments were stimulated sequentially and randomly. The obtained contractions displaced the intraluminal content in individual propulsion steps. ⋯ When inhibiting cholinergic transmission by atropine, the propulsion induced by 0.3 msec pulses was blocked, while partially inhibited when using 30 msec pulses. Inhibiting nitric oxide synthesis by N(G) -nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) blocked propulsion induced by both of the pulse durations. In conclusion, electrical stimulation induces propulsion when using both 0.3 and 30 msec long pulses; stimulation using 0.3 msec pulses activates neurons, whereas 30 msec pulses depolarize muscles; in the absence of nitrergic transmission, propulsion cannot be induced by electrical stimulation.