Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
-
During the last decade, the complementary value of real-world data (through registries or medical records) and data from randomized clinical trials has been recognized as increasingly important. In the field of neuromodulation, only a few industry-independent nationwide neuromodulation registries are available. The interest in creating a European registry has increased but without a successful result. The goal of this online survey is to gain further insights into the need for and burden of a European registry for neuromodulation. ⋯ More than 90% of the respondents believed that a European registry for neuromodulation is needed, mainly to obtain real-world (big) data about the effectiveness and safety of this therapy. This survey clearly pointed to the need for a European registry for which it seems key to ensure financial and logistical support, in addition to in-depth legal guidance in developing this registry.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Cylindrical vs Paddle Leads in Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Long-term Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
This systematic review compares the long-term efficacy of cylindrical-lead spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) vs paddle-lead spinal cord stimulation (Paddle-SCS) for chronic pain management. ⋯ Paddle-SCS offers superior pain reduction (as measured by the VAS) and a lower migration rate, but a higher infection risk compared with CL-SCS. CL-SCS showed better outcomes as measured by the NRS. The choice between Paddle-SCS and CL-SCS should be individualized according to patient-specific factors and treatment goals. Further research with rigorous study designs is needed to provide clearer comparisons between these interventions.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation, Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation, and Association of Both in Patients With Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Trial (BOOST-DRG Study).
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) have individually shown efficacy in relieving pain in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome after spinal surgery (PSPS-T2). Combining SCS and DRGS simultaneously, along with Burst stimulation programming, may enhance the responder rate of patients with PSPS-T2. ⋯ The full option to stimulate different neural structures, separately or simultaneously, led to improved responder rates, allowing patients to personalize treatment. A multidimensional assessment is essential to reveal the full potential benefits of neuromodulation in patients with chronic pain.
-
Observational Study
Evaluating Spinal Cord Stimulation as a Therapeutic Strategy for Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is a chronic condition that significantly impacts breast cancer survivors, marked by persistent neuropathic pain that is often unresponsive to conventional therapies. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a promising intervention for managing this type of pain. This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of SCS in managing PMPS and identify patient-specific factors impacting treatment outcomes. ⋯ SCS is an effective treatment for PMPS, with age, BMI, psychologic treatments, and prior radiotherapy being significant predictors of outcomes. Tailoring treatment plans to these factors can potentially enhance pain management for patients with PMPS.