Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Mar 2016
ReviewThe Second American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Medicine Assessment of Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: Executive Summary.
In 2009 and again in 2012, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine assembled an expert panel to assess the evidence basis for ultrasound guidance as a nerve localization tool for regional anesthesia. ⋯ Scientific evidence from the past 5 years has clarified and strengthened our understanding of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia as a nerve localization tool. High-level evidence supports ultrasound guidance contributing to superior characteristics with selected blocks, although absolute differences with the comparator technique are often relatively small (especially for upper-extremity blocks). The clinical meaningfulness of these differences is likely of variable importance to individual practitioners. The use of ultrasound significantly reduces the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity as well as the incidence and intensity of hemidiaphragmatic paresis, but has no significant effect on the incidence of postoperative neurologic symptoms. WHAT'S NEW IN THIS UPDATE?: This evidence-based assessment of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia reviews findings from our 2010 publication and focuses on new meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large case series published since 2009. New to this exercise is an in-depth analysis of the accuracy and reliability of ultrasound guidance for identifying needle-to-nerve relationships. This version no longer addresses ultrasound for interventional pain medicine procedures, because the growth of that field demands separate consideration. Since our 2010 publication, new information has either supported or strengthened our original conclusions. There is no evidence that ultrasound is inferior to alternative nerve localization methods.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Mar 2016
ReviewUpdate on Ultrasound for Truncal Blocks: A Review of the Evidence.
We summarized the evidence for ultrasound (US) guidance for truncal blocks in 2010 by performing a systematic literature review and rating the strength of evidence for each block using a system developed by the United States Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Since then, numerous studies of US guidance for truncal blocks have been published. ⋯ To provide updated recommendations, we performed another systematic search of the literature to identify studies pertaining to US guidance for the following blocks: paravertebral, intercostal, transversus abdominis plane, rectus sheath, ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric, as well as the Pecs, quadratus lumborum, and transversalis fascia blocks. We rated the methodologic quality of each of the identified studies and then graded the strength of evidence supporting the use of US for each block based on the number and quality of available studies for that block.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Mar 2016
ReviewUpdate on Ultrasound for Truncal Blocks: A Review of the Evidence.
We summarized the evidence for ultrasound (US) guidance for truncal blocks in 2010 by performing a systematic literature review and rating the strength of evidence for each block using a system developed by the United States Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Since then, numerous studies of US guidance for truncal blocks have been published. ⋯ To provide updated recommendations, we performed another systematic search of the literature to identify studies pertaining to US guidance for the following blocks: paravertebral, intercostal, transversus abdominis plane, rectus sheath, ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric, as well as the Pecs, quadratus lumborum, and transversalis fascia blocks. We rated the methodologic quality of each of the identified studies and then graded the strength of evidence supporting the use of US for each block based on the number and quality of available studies for that block.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Mar 2016
ReviewEvidence Basis for Ultrasound Guidance for Lower-Extremity Peripheral Nerve Block: Update 2016.
This article reviews and summarizes randomized controlled studies that have investigated ultrasound guidance (USG) for lower-extremity peripheral nerve blocks in comparison with other peripheral nerve localization techniques and those that compared different ultrasound-guided techniques investigating optimal perineural local anesthetic distribution patterns. Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria (minimum Jadad score 3), and 10 additional studies directly compared USG with peripheral nerve stimulation, and 5 additional studies directly compared USG with landmark-based field blocks. ⋯ Ultrasound was never inferior to peripheral nerve stimulation. The research focus has evolved during the last 5 years into investigating optimal ultrasound-guided techniques.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Mar 2016
ReviewThe Requisites of Needle-to-Nerve Proximity for Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: A Scoping Review of the Evidence.
This scoping review examines the literature to determine whether the position of the needle tip relative to the target nerve is accurately and reliably detected during ultrasound (US)-guided regional anesthesia. The requisites for successful and safe needle tip positioning relative to the target nerve include accurate and reliable needle presentation by the machine, needle interpretation by the operator, nerve presentation by the machine, and nerve interpretation by the operator. Failure to visualize the needle tip is a common occurrence, frequently prompting operators to use needle and probe maneuvers, which are not necessarily based on evidence. Needle tip interpretation often relies on surrogate indicators that have not been validated. The acoustic resolution of modern portable US machines limits the extent to which nerve microanatomy can be reliably presented. Finally, our interpretation of the sonographic end points for local anesthetic injection that best balance success and safety for US-guided regional anesthesia continues to evolve. ⋯ In order to determine whether or not the position of the needle tip relative to the target nerve is accurately and reliably detected during US-guided regional anesthesia, the available literature is reviewed and interpreted to address the following 4 questions.