Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Sep 2003
Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of heart rate response to an epinephrine test dose and painful stimulus in children during sevoflurane anesthesia: heart rate variability and beat-to-beat analysis.
During regional anesthesia, various stimuli leading to an adrenergic response can occur. However, simulation of an epidural test dose by using intravenous administration of epinephrine (EPI) has always been compared with an intravenous saline infusion as the control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of distinguishing in children the effect on HR by an intravascular epinephrine infusion and a painful stimulus, using heart rate variability (HRV) and beat-to-beat analysis of HR. ⋯ Detection of the secondary HR decrease, 60 seconds after the first change in HR, allows us to distinguish the effects of a painful stimulus from those related to the epinephrine test dose at 1 MAC of sevoflurane. This secondary HR decrease induced by epinephrine appears primarily because of a compensatory increase in parasympathetic tone.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Sep 2003
Clinical TrialLateral approach to the sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa: correlation between evoked motor response and sensory block.
The purpose of this study was to identify which of two motor responses of the foot (plantar flexion versus dorsiflexion) best predicts complete sensory blockade of the sciatic nerve when is used for lateral popliteal sciatic nerve block. ⋯ After stimulation of the sciatic nerve, plantar flexion better predicts complete sensory blockade of the foot than dorsiflexion when using the lateral approach to the popliteal fossa. The findings of the present study apply to a single injection of 30 mL of ropivacaine 0.75%.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Sep 2003
Clinical TrialRelationship between evoked motor response and sensory paresthesia in interscalene brachial plexus block.
This study sought to define the relationship between a paresthesia and a motor response (MR) to electrical nerve stimulation using a peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) during interscalene block. We sought to determine if at a low amperage (< or =1.0 mA) a MR would precede a paresthesia. ⋯ MR preceded paresthesia in every patient. The most likely explanation for this observation is that MR can be achieved at a small distance from the nerve, whereas elicitation of mechanical paresthesia requires either nerve contact or more intimate location of the needle's tip relative to the nerve. Another possible explanation is that motor fibers are located in a more superficial position and are therefore encountered first. Motor and sensory responses are separate and discrete phenomena.