Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · May 1999
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialPercutaneous epidural neuroplasty: prospective evaluation of 0.9% NaCl versus 10% NaCl with or without hyaluronidase.
Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (epidural neurolysis, lysis of epidural adhesions) is an interventional pain management technique that has emerged over approximately the last 10 years as part of a multidisciplinary approach to treating radiculopathy with low back pain. In addition to local anesthetic and corticosteroid, hypertonic saline (10% NaCl) and hyaluronidase are used for the technique. The objective of this study was to determine if hypertonic saline or hyaluronidase influenced treatment outcomes. ⋯ Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty, as part of an overall pain management strategy, reduces pain (sometimes for over one year) in 25% or more of subjects with radiculopathy plus low back pain refractory to conventional therapies. The use of hypertonic saline may reduce the number of patients that require additional treatments.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Mar 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of 0.5% articaine and 0.5% prilocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia of the arm: a cross-over study in volunteers.
Earlier studies of the use of articaine in intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) are conflicting. In fact, despite similar physicochemical properties and regional anesthetic action, significant differences between articaine and prilocaine in IVRA have been reported. Articaine, being a potent local anesthetic with low degree of toxicity and being rapidly metabolized by esterases, could be a useful local anesthetic particularly in IVRA and, perhaps, could challenge prilocaine, the present local anesthetic of choice for this technique. ⋯ Both 0.5% articaine and 0.5% prilocaine, in a median dose of 40 mL in adults, injected in 2 minutes, are effective and equipotent local anesthetics in IVRA of the arm. An earlier reported four-time faster onset time of the block by articaine in comparison with prilocaine may be caused by a very rapid injection rate (40 mL/30 sec) by the investigators of that study. The erythematous skin rashes after IVRA, in particular when articaine was used, may be a sign of venous endothelial irritation.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Mar 1999
Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialRopivacaine 0.25% and 0.5%, but not 0.125%, provide effective wound infiltration analgesia after outpatient hernia repair, but with sustained plasma drug levels.
Ropivacaine is a long-acting local anesthetic similar to bupivacaine, but with lower cardiac toxicity and intrinsic vasoconstrictive properties that may reduce the risk and extent of systemic plasma absorption. Plasma levels and risks are associated with the total dose used and the extent of absorption, with lower doses potentially representing less risk. Although both 0.5% and 0.75% ropivacaine provide adequate analgesia for wound infiltration after hernia repair, the efficacy of lower doses and the early systemic absorption have not been reported. ⋯ Ropivacaine 0.25% and 0.5% is adequate for pain relief after outpatient hernia repair, whereas the 0.125% solution is no more effective than saline. Prolonged systemic absorption from peripheral injection may be associated with prolonged elevations of plasma concentrations, which potentially could be associated with unexpectedly high plasma levels if repeated injections are performed in the perioperative period with higher concentrations or doses.