Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Feb 2020
Comparative Study Observational StudyAcoustic respiration rate and pulse oximetry-derived respiration rate: a clinical comparison study.
Respiration rate (RR) is a critical vital sign that provides early detection of respiratory compromise. The acoustic technique of measuring continuous respiration rate (RRa) interprets the large airway sound envelope to calculate respiratory rate while pulse oximetry-derived respiratory rate (RRoxi) interprets modulations of the photoplethsymograph in response to hemodynamic changes during the respiratory cycle. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of these technologies to each other and to a capnography-based reference device. ⋯ RRoxi also displayed a value for significantly longer time periods than RRa when the subjects produced physiological sounds and moved their heads, but not during shallow breathing or ambient noise. RRoxi may be more accurate than RRa during development of bradypnea. Also, RRoxi may display a more reliable RR value during routine patient activities.
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Feb 2020
Observational StudyMeasuring the accuracy of propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) before and after surgery with major blood loss.
Target-controlled infusion (TCI) is based on pharmacokinetic models designed to achieve a desired drug level in the blood. TCI's predictive accuracy of plasma propofol levels at the end of surgery with major blood loss has not been well established. This prospective observational study included adult patients (BMI 20-35 kg/m2) undergoing surgery with expected blood loss ≥ 1500 mL. ⋯ Propofol TCI allows clinically unproblematic conduct of general anaesthesia. In cases of major blood loss, the probability of propofol TCI overestimating plasma levels increases. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS; DRKS00009312).
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Feb 2020
Randomized Controlled TrialPretreatment with glucose-insulin-potassium improves ventricular performances after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
Heart failure is the main cause of poor outcome following open heart surgery and experimental studies have demonstrated that glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) infusion exerts cardioprotective effects by reducing myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injuries. This randomized controlled trial was designed to assess the effects of GIK on left ventricular function in moderate-to-high risk patients undergoing on-pump isolated coronary artery bypass surgery (CABGS), or combined with aortic valve replacement. The primary outcomes were the effects of GIK on two- and three-dimensional left ventricular ejection fraction (2D and 3D-LVEF), and on transmitral flow propagation velocity (Vp), that occurred between the pre- and post-CPB periods. ⋯ In GIK pretreated patients (N = 54), 2-D and 3D-LVEF and Vp increased slightly during surgery (mean difference [MD] + 3.5%, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] - 0.2 to 7.1%, MD + 4.0%, 95% CI 0.6-7.4%, and MD + 22.2%, 95% CI 16.0-28.4%, respectively). In contrast, in the Placebo group (N = 46), 2D-and 3D-LVEF, as well as Vp all decreased after CPB (MD - 7.5% [- 11.6 to - 3.4%], MD - 12.0% [- 15.2 to - 8.8%] and MD - 21.3% [- 25.7 to - 16.9%], respectively). In conclusion, the administration of GIK resulted in better preservation of systolic and diastolic ventricular function in the early period following weaning from CPB.
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Feb 2020
Observational StudyA simplified quantitative acid-base approach for patients with acute respiratory diseases.
The Stewart-Figge acid-base model has been criticized for being mathematically complex. We aimed to develop simpler formalisms, which can be used at the bedside. The following simplifications were used: (1) [Ca2+] and [Mg2+] are replaced by their mid-reference concentrations (2) pH is set to 7.4. ⋯ A [SIDa, adj] < 50.4 meq/l had an accuracy of 0.995 (p < 0.001) for the diagnosis of strong ion (SI) acidosis, while a [SIDa, adj] > 52.5 meq/l had an accuracy of 0.997 (p < 0.001) for the diagnosis of SI alkalosis. A [BICgap] > 11.6 meq/l predicted unmeasured ion (UI) acidosis with an accuracy of 0.997 (p < 0.001), while an [AGc] > 19.88 meq/l predicted UI acidosis with an accuracy of 0.994 (p < 0.001). The "[BICgap] model" is a reliable tool for the assessment of acid-base disorders in patients with acute respiratory diseases. [BICgap] is not inferior to [AGc] in the diagnosis of UI acidosis.