Journal of palliative medicine
-
Comparative Study
Respiratory tract secretions in the dying patient: a comparison between glycopyrronium and hyoscine hydrobromide.
The evidence for the management of respiratory tract secretions (RTS) in dying patients with antimuscarinic drugs remains inconclusive. This study investigated the effectiveness of glycopyrronium versus hyoscine hydrobromide in controlling RTS using the Liverpool Care of the Dying Pathway (LCP) in 72 patients matched for age, diagnosis, and gender who died on a 30-bed specialist palliative care unit. All patients in the glycoypyrronium group had some response to glycopyrronium, whereas 22% of patients in the hyoscine group had no response to hyoscine hydrobromide. ⋯ Twenty-eight percent of patients in the glycopyrronium and 42% of patients in the hyoscine group died with RTS present. There was no statistically significant difference in the levels of agitation following administration of either drug. This study provides further evidence that the LCP can be a useful tool in the evaluation of new drugs for symptom control in dying patients and suggests that glycopyrronium may be at least as effective in controlling RTS in dying patients as hyoscine hydrobromide.
-
To continuously assess overall quality of life (QOL) and disease progression in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) at different stages of the disease and compare the results between these two variables. ⋯ It can be concluded that ALS does not necessarily result in a low overall QOL and that despite disease progression overall QOL changes only slightly over time.
-
The Fellowship Directors Forum, a special interest group of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM) initiated an assessment of the needs of directors of fellowship programs in the emerging specialty of hospice and palliative care. One major finding, which may contribute to understanding the needs of other new disciplines, is that directors come into this role with clinical and teaching experience, but lacking administrative, educational, and management skills perceived as necessary to success. A study team collected data from current and former fellowship directors across the United States using an online survey and telephone interviews. ⋯ Results showed that directors believe development of an outcome-based standardized curriculum is vitally important to advancement of the field, and that this should be developed collaboratively through the Forum. Although directors were confident of their own clinical and teaching skills, directors identified a lack of adequate training and experience in several management and educational skill areas critical to running a successful fellowship program. The study team made several recommendations: develop models from parts of existing programs that can be incorporated into a standardized curriculum to meet Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements; provide workshops and toolkits for new directors to address the lack of management and educational skills; and establish new communication methods through more or longer forum meetings, a dedicated website, and an online discussion group.