Journal of palliative medicine
-
Outpatient palliative care, an evolving delivery model, seeks to improve continuity of care across settings and to increase access to services in hospice and palliative medicine (HPM). It can provide a critical bridge between inpatient palliative care and hospice, filling the gap in community-based supportive care for patients with advanced life-limiting illness. Low capacities for data collection and quantitative research in HPM have impeded assessment of the impact of outpatient palliative care. ⋯ A collaborative regional approach to HPM data can support evaluation and improvement of palliative care quality at the local, aggregated, and statewide levels.
-
An increased demand for palliative care services has been demonstrated, in part due to an aging population and an enhanced role of palliative care in nonmalignant illness. In particular, there is a demand for inpatient palliative care unit beds, with several services now creating waiting lists for admission. The aim of this study was to explore the development, implementation, and outcomes following the introduction of an inpatient palliative care admission triage tool. ⋯ This study represents the first reported attempt to define the priorities for a waiting list for admission to palliative care units, and demonstrates its utility in providing a transparent process for palliative care units to manage the competing needs of patients referred for care.
-
Current evidence suggests that patients with hematological malignancies less frequently access palliative care services, and for those who do, this tends to occur later in their illness than their counterparts with solid malignancies. These patients are also more likely to die in hospital following escalating interventions. This approach to care that considers palliative care referral after most treatments are exhausted has implications for the quality of palliative care intervention possible. ⋯ Meanwhile, hematologists should be aware of the benefits of palliative care earlier in an illness trajectory and that palliative care does not equate to terminal care only. This review summarizes current practices and barriers to referral, and suggests recommendations for collaborative care and further research in the palliation of hemato-oncological patients. In doing so, it highlights to palliative care and hematology physicians how successful integration of their disciplines may improve their care of these patients.
-
Comparative Study
Families' perceptions of end-of-life care in Veterans Affairs versus non-Veterans Affairs facilities.
The Veterans Affairs (VA) has made significant investments in care for veterans. However, it is not known whether these investments have produced improvements in end-of-life care in the VA compared to other settings. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare families' perceptions of end-of-life care among patients who died in VA and non-VA facilities. ⋯ Families of patients who died in VA facilities rated care as being better than did families of those who died in non-VA facilities. These results provide preliminary evidence that the VA's investment in end-of-life care has contributed to improvements in care in VA facilities compared to non-VA facilities.