Journal of palliative medicine
-
Assessment of spiritual suffering and provision of spiritual care are a central component of palliative care (PC). Unfortunately, many PC clinicians, like most medical providers, have received limited or superficial training in spirituality and spiritual distress. This article, written by a group of spiritual care providers, and other PC and hospice clinicians, offers a more in-depth look at religion and spirituality to help to enhance readers' current skills while offering a practical roadmap for screening for spiritual distress and an overview of partnering with colleagues to ensure patients receive values-aligned spiritual care provision.
-
Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) encompasses conditions with poor outcome and severe suffering, both mentally and physically, yet utilization and research into palliative care interventions remain sparse. Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify existing evidence on palliative care intervention for chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Design: We conducted a PROSPERO-registered systematic review of studies published between 1991 and 2020 in which people with PAD received palliative care interventions and at least one patient outcome was recorded. ⋯ Conclusion: Despite high mortality and morbidity associated with PAD, evidence of the effectiveness of palliative care in this group of patients is lacking. There are only a handful of articles on palliative care for people with PAD, and the majority are small, methodologically flawed and lack meaningful patient-reported outcomes. High-quality research of palliative care interventions in patients with PAD is urgently needed to better understand the impact of palliative care on quality of end of life and to develop and evaluate service-level interventions.
-
Surviving Long Enough to Die? An Analysis of Incomplete Assessments for Medical Assistance in Dying.
Background: Medical assistance in dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada on June 17, 2016, yet many who request MAiD do not complete the assessment process and instead experience a natural death. This analysis of patients who made a formal request for MAiD aims to clarify timelines and factors associated with completion of the MAiD assessment process, and factors associated with completion or noncompletion of MAiD once eligible. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients in Nova Scotia who requested MAiD between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018, were deceased at the time of analysis, did not withdraw their request, and were not formally deemed ineligible for the procedure (n = 218). ⋯ Those with an incomplete assessment had a median survival from request to death of 8.0 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 11.5), whereas for those deemed eligible, median survival from request to determination of MAiD eligibility was also 8.0 days (IQR = 16.0). Interpretation: Proximity to natural death and poor performance status at the time of MAiD request may drive incomplete MAiD assessments. The majority of patients deemed eligible for MAiD complete the procedure, and as such, patients who did not complete the MAiD assessment process may not have experienced their preferred mode of death.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Race Differences in Quality of Life following a Palliative Care Intervention in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: Insights from the Palliative Care in Heart Failure Trial.
Introduction: Black patients have a higher incidence of heart failure (HF) and worse outcomes than white patients. Guidelines recommend palliative care for patients with advanced HF, but no studies have examined outcomes in a black patient cohort. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of the Palliative Care in Heart Failure trial, which randomized patients to usual care plus a palliative care intervention (UC+PAL) or usual care (UC). ⋯ However, the findings were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Larger studies are needed to assess the benefits of palliative care for black patients with HF. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01589601.
-
The issue of generalist versus specialist palliative care is on the minds of healthcare leaders everywhere. We are amid changing demographics of physicians. ⋯ Is it important to identify patients who benefit the most from specialist palliative care, given that it is currently a limited resource? Should we step out of standard practice and redesign palliative care using principles of population management? The COVID pandemic rapidly introduced virtual palliative care consults. Is it a better way to promote wide access to specialty palliative care? Looking forward, should we promote ways to advance primary palliative care and reserve specialty palliative care to patients who will benefit most from this level of care? These questions, and others, are considered in this transcribed discussion between leading physicians in the field.