Journal of palliative medicine
-
Background: The debate over legalizing medical assistance in dying (assisted dying) is ongoing, also in Nordic countries such as Sweden where assisted dying is illegal. A 2020 survey by the Swedish Medical Association highlighted varied perspectives, with 41% of physicians supporting and 34% opposing legalization. Professionals in palliative care were more negative toward it. ⋯ The open-ended questions revealed thoughts regarding the complexity of the issue and the need for further discussion and education. Conclusion: In Sweden, where euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is illegal, more than one-third of palliative care professionals were in favor of legalizing these practices while one-fourth were undecided, these proportions differed markedly between professions. Further, we uncovered a significant need for further discussion and education.
-
Background: Formal assessment of What Matters in end-of-life care is often done in medical settings through legal forms. Past research indicates that Native Hawaiians are less likely to complete these forms than Whites. The purpose of this study was to explore health care preferences among Native Hawaiian elders and to identify cultural themes that may impact quality care at end of life. ⋯ Results: Themes suggest the criticality of: (1) incorporating cultural traditions into health care routines; (2) involving family in health and end-of-life decisions; (3) supporting home-based care at the end of life; and (4) building strong patient-provider relationships. Conclusion: Although findings parallel preferences expressed in other populations, the data provide additional insights into the preferences of Native Hawaiian elders anticipating end-of-life care. Recommendations for culturally competent care include: (1) develop relationships with Native Hawaiian patients well before end-of-life care is needed to facilitate discussions of care preferences; (2) work collaboratively with the patient and the patient's defined family; (3) ask about cultural practices and engage traditional healers as directed by the patient; and (4) provide services in patients' homes and communities.
-
The field of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (HPM) has its roots in the principles, promulgated by Dame Cicely Saunders, that patient and family are the unit of care and that comprehensive integration of physical, psychological, social, and spiritual care is necessary to address suffering in all its dimensions. Although we aspire to provide comprehensive care for our patients, most hospice and palliative care (HPM) physicians lack basic competencies for identifying and managing patients with psychological distress and mental health distress and disorders, a growing segment of our clinical population. ⋯ The history of our field, the nature of our clinical workforce, the culture of PC, and our educational programs all contribute to our current practice model, which is not adequate to meet the mental health needs of our patients. I propose strategies to address these challenges focused on enhancing integration between psychiatry/psychology and HPM, changes in fellowship education and faculty development, addressing the stigma against people with mental health diagnoses, and addressing system and cultural challenges that limit our ability to provide the kind of comprehensive, integrative care that our field aspires to.