Journal of palliative medicine
-
Context: Specialty palliative care has been associated with cost savings at the end of life, while patient navigators have been independently associated with cost savings due to screening and treatment early in the course of disease. Evidence is limited regarding patient navigators and cost savings at the end of life. Objectives: To determine the cost-effectiveness of a lay patient navigator intervention in improving palliative care outcomes for Hispanic persons with serious noncancer illness. ⋯ Spending was lower (p = 0.05) in the last 30 days of life for individuals who died in hospice ($9,403) than those who did not ($19,032), and persons in the intervention had a significantly (p = 0.03) higher probability of dying in hospice (63%) versus those in the control group (37%). Conclusion: Study results support the use of a culturally tailored lay patient navigator intervention to improve palliative care outcomes. The results suggest a potential return on investment for culturally appropriate lay patient navigator interventions of 4:1.
-
Background: Inpatient palliative care (PC) consultations are increasingly used to address operational challenges. We aimed to understand how PC consultations in a southeastern program, affected by pandemic-related care delays, impacted common clinical performance metrics. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a tertiary system's adult patients who received PC consultations from December 2021 to August 2022. ⋯ Despite a significantly longer length of stay (LOS) (12.46 days vs. 6.99 days, p < 0.001), the PC group experienced a lower readmission rate (adjusted odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.65, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our cohort study using MS-DRG matching indicates that despite increased LOS, PC consultations were associated with significantly lower readmission rates. This suggests their potential to improve resource utilization, especially in regions affected by pandemic-deferred care.