Drug Safety
-
Review Comparative Study
Risks and benefits of drugs used in the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is an age-old problem; more so since the blooming of ambulatory or day surgery centres within the last 2 decades. The aetiology of PONV is multifactorial. The incidence of PONV is usually higher in women and children than in men. ⋯ However, it is almost impossible to pick one agent or one combination as the therapy of choice using the present available data. A patient history of a favourable response to a previously used antiemetic would make that drug the agent of choice. So far, the newcomers, the 5HT3 antagonists, have fewer reported adverse effects.
-
The idea of making oral contraceptives available without prescription has a long history, and has been recently revived in the US and the UK. High dose oral contraceptives have generally been replaced by low dose formulations and, subsequently, most cardiovascular risks have been reduced and a protection against ovarian and uterine cancers has been consistently demonstrated. ⋯ Some countries have introduced alternatives to prescription-only oral contraceptives, whereby nurses, midwives, social workers and/or pharmacists are incorporated into the distribution process. This article concludes that the balance of risks and benefits is in favour of OTC access for oral contraceptives.
-
Review Comparative Study
Comparative adverse effect profiles of platinum drugs.
Since the discovery of the biologically active platinum complexes 30 years ago, 2 agents have become widely established in clinical oncology practice. Both cisplatin and carboplatin are platinum(II) complexes with 2 ammonia groups in the cis- position. However, they differ in their solubility, chemical reactivity, dichloride or alicyclic oxygenated leaving groups, pharmacokinetics and toxicology. ⋯ Strong relationships between carboplatin renal clearance, glomerular filtration rate, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of filterable platinum and severity of thrombocytopenia have prompted dose adjustment according to renal function. New analogues such as JM216 offer the potential advantages of oral administration and few nonhaematological toxicities. Analogues based on the diaminocyclohexane ligand have encountered problematic neurotoxicity.
-
The serotonin syndrome has increasingly been recognised in patients who have received combined serotonergic drugs. This syndrome is characterised by a constellation of symptoms (confusion, fever, shivering, diaphoresis, ataxia, hyperelflexia, myoclonus or diarrhoea) in the setting of the recent addition of a serotonergic agent. The most common drug combinations causing the serotonin syndrome are monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), MAOIs and tricyclic antidepressants, MAOIs and tryptophan, and MAOIs and pethidine (meperidine). ⋯ The serotonin syndrome is usually mild and, if managed with drug withdrawal and supportive therapy, generally improves within hours. Patients who develop hyperthermia should be treated aggressively with external cooling and paralysis. Methysergide and cyproheptadine appear to be useful adjuncts in treating the serotonin syndrome.
-
Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders. Even though existing antiepileptic drugs can render 80% of newly diagnosed patients seizure free, a significant number of patients have chronic intractable epilepsy causing disability with considerable socioeconomic implications. There is, therefore, a need for more potent and effective antiepileptic drugs and drugs with fewer adverse effects, particularly CNS effects. ⋯ There is also the possibility of rational duotherapy, using drugs with known mechanisms of action, as an additional therapeutic approach. The efficacy of these 12 antiepileptic drug occurs despite the fact that candidate antiepileptic drugs are evaluated under highly unfavourable conditions, namely as add-on therapy in patients refractory to drug management and with high seizure frequency. Thus, whilst candidate drugs which do become licensed are an advance in that they are effective and/or are associated with less adverse effects than currently available antiepileptic drugs in these patients, it is possible that these drugs may exhibit even more improved risk-benefit ratios when used in normal clinical practice.