J Emerg Med
-
Despite the broad differential diagnosis in any patient referring with symptoms involving the chest or abdomen, a small number of conditions overshadow the rest by their probability. Chest and abdominal wall pain continues to constitute a common and expensive overlooked source of pain of unknown cause. In particular, cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome is commonly encountered but not easily diagnosed unless its specific symptoms are sought and the precise physical examination undertaken. ⋯ A primigravida woman with unbearable abdominal pain was referred repeatedly seeking a solution for her suffering. Numerous laboratory and imaging studies were employed in order to elucidate the cause of her condition. After numerous visits and unnecessary delay, the diagnosis was finally made by a physician fully versed in the field of torso wall pain. The focused physical examination disclosed abdominal cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome as the diagnosis, and anesthetic infiltration led to immediate alleviation of her pain. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Cutaneous nerve entrapment is a common cause of abdominal pain that is reached on the basis of thorough history and physical examination alone. Knowledge dissemination of the various torso wall syndromes is imperative for prompt delivery of suitable care. All emergency physicians should be fully aware of this entity because the diagnosis is based solely on physical examination, and immediate relief can be provided in the framework of the first visit. Wider recognition of this syndrome will promise that such mishaps are not repeated in the future.
-
Temporary transvenous pacemaker implantation is an important and critical procedure for emergency physicians. Traditionally, temporary pacemakers are inserted by electrocardiography (ECG) guidance in the emergency department because fluoroscopy at the bedside in an unstable patient can be limited by time and equipment availability. However, in the presence of atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, and patent foramen ovale, the pacemaker lead can be implanted inadvertently into the left ventricle or directly into the coronary sinus instead of right ventricle. Regular pacemaker rhythm can be achieved despite inadvertent implantation of the pacemaker lead into the left ventricle, leading to ignorance of the possibility of lead malposition. ⋯ A 65-year-old female patient with hemodynamic instability and complete atrioventricular block underwent temporary pacemaker implantation via right jugular vein with ECG guidance at the emergency department. Approximately 12 h after implantation, it was noticed that the ECG revealed right bundle branch block (RBBB)-type paced QRS complexes. Diagnostic workup revealed that the lead was inadvertently located in the left ventricular apex. This case illustrates the importance of careful scrutiny of the 12-lead ECG and imaging clues in identifying lead malposition in the emergency department. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Because inadvertent left ventricle endocardial pacing carries a high risk for systemic embolization, it is important to determine whether an RBBB pattern induced by ventricular pacing is the result of a malpositioned lead or uncomplicated transvenous right ventricular pacing.