J Emerg Med
-
Patients presenting to the emergency department with paralysis can have a wide differential diagnosis. Thyrotoxic periodic paralysis (TPP) is a rare disorder causing transient flaccid paralysis in the setting of thyrotoxicosis and hypokalemia. It has been reported in Asian male populations predominantly, and the diagnosis is rarely considered in non-Asian populations. Recent research has identified cases in patients with diverse ethnic backgrounds, although epidemiologic data from the United States are very limited. ⋯ Young Hispanic men presenting with paralysis should be evaluated for TPP, as the prevalence in this population may be higher than estimated previously. Management of TPP involves treatment of underlying hyperthyroidism and cautious potassium repletion, with an initial dose of no more than 60 mEq/L of potassium chloride to avoid rebound hyperkalemia.
-
Daycare and school closures prompted by shelter-in-place orders may have increased opportunities for unintentional ingestions among young children. ⋯ Despite dramatic decreases in overall ED patient volumes, the absolute number and severity of toxic exposures were similar during the pandemic compared with previous years. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.
-
Cervical spinal (c-spine) injuries range greatly in severity from minor ligamentous injuries to osteoligamentous instability with spinal cord injuries. Initial evaluation begins with stabilization as needed and immediate immobilization. Current practice as to whether the c-spine can be cleared clinically without radiographic evaluation is often guided by using the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Low-Risk Criteria and the Canadian C-Spine Rule. Under these clinical decision guidelines, stable trauma patients presenting with alcohol intoxication cannot have the c-spine cleared clinically and imaging should be "considered." ⋯ This study's results suggest that it is a safe clinical practice to defer CT imaging for patients presenting to the ED with alcohol intoxication and low suspicion for c-spine injury per history and examination.
-
Case Reports
Neurologically Intact Survival after Bihemispheric Penetrating Head Trauma: A Case Report.
Patients with penetrating head trauma that crosses the midline of the brain have a high mortality rate; most die in the prehospital setting or during initial resuscitative efforts. However, surviving patients are often neurologically intact and several factors other than bullet path, including post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale, age, and pupillary abnormalities, must be considered in aggregate when prognosticating patients. ⋯ We present a case of an 18-year-old man who presented unresponsive after a single gunshot wound to the head that traversed the bilateral hemispheres. The patient was managed with standard care and without surgical intervention. He was discharged from the hospital neurologically intact 2 weeks after his injury. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Patients with such apparently devastating injuries are at risk of premature termination of aggressive resuscitative efforts based on clinician bias that these efforts are futile and that patients cannot recover to a neurologically meaningful outcome. Our case reminds clinicians that patients with severe injury patterns with bihemispheric involvement can recover with good outcomes, and that bullet path is only one variable among multiple that must be considered to predict clinical outcome.
-
Since the development of the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved vaccine for the prevention of serious disease and death associated with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, health care workers have been expected to comply with mandatory immunization requirements or face potential termination of employment and censure by their state medical boards. Although most accepted this mandate, there have been several who have felt this was an unnecessary intrusion and violation of their right to choose their own health care mitigation strategies, or an infringement on their autonomy and other civil liberties. Others have argued that being a health care professional places your duties above your own self-interests, so-called fiduciary duties. As a result of these duties, there is an expected obligation to do the best action to achieve the "most good" for society. A so-called "utilitarian argument." ⋯ Although arguments for and against vaccine mandates are compelling, it is the opinion of the Ethics Committee of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine that vaccine mandates for health care workers are ethically just and appropriate, and the benefit to society far outweighs the minor inconvenience to an individual's personal liberties.