J Trauma
-
Comparative Study
Limiting initial resuscitation of uncontrolled hemorrhage reduces internal bleeding and subsequent volume requirements.
We tested the hypothesis that full or "standard resuscitation" (SR) with lactated Ringer's solution (LRS) results in increased bleeding in uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, compared with a "limited prehospital resuscitation" (LPR) regimen and a control group of "no resuscitation" (NR). Cardiac output was used as physiological endpoint for resuscitation. Twenty swine had 25 mL/kg of blood withdrawn during a 30-minute controlled hemorrhage, followed by a 20-minute "prehospital" resuscitation regimen was conducted in three groups: the SR group (n = 6), LRS infused as needed to restore cardiac index (CI) to 100% baseline; the LPR group (n = 8), with resuscitation using LRS to 60% of baseline CI, with volume limited to 10 mL/kg; and the NR group (n = 6). ⋯ Peritoneal blood volume was significantly higher in the SR group (20.6 +/- 5.6 mL/kg), versus the LPR (7.3 +/- 1.3 mL/kg; p < 0.05) and NR groups (3.0 +/- 0.9 mL/kg; p < 0.05). Crystalloid and whole blood requirements during the intraoperative resuscitation phase were significantly higher in the SR group (193 +/- 16.0 and 9.0 +/- 2.5 mL/kg), than in LPR (111.8 +/- 15.6 and 4.5 +/- 1.8 mL/kg; p < 0.05) and NR groups (128.5 +/- 32.3 and 3.9 +/- 2.3 mL/kg; p < 0.05). In the presence of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, LPR and NR can significantly reduce internal hemorrhage and subsequent intraoperative crystalloid and blood requirements.
-
Tension pneumothorax and hemothorax are life-threatening emergencies that require immediate treatment. Field stabilization of trauma patients often requires rapid surgical drainage of these injuries but inevitably delays departure for hospital. Conventional treatment involves the insertion of a chest drain but we describe a modified technique of simple thoracostomy that is faster and simpler to perform and avoids the risks associated with insertion of the chest drain. Following use of a simple thoracostomy as an alternative to chest drain insertion in 45 patients at the roadside, this technique appears to have important advantages over conventional techniques and warrants further clinical evaluation.
-
Comparative Study
Evolution of management of major hepatic trauma: identification of patterns of injury.
Nonoperative management of hemodynamically stable patients following blunt hepatic trauma identified by computed tomography (CT) has been reported in up to 20% of patients presenting with hepatic injury, predominantly low grade. We reviewed 128 consecutive adult patients sustaining blunt hepatic trauma with the hypothesis that severe hepatic injuries (grades III to V) could be safely managed nonoperatively and to determine anatomic pattern and severity of hepatic injuries. Sixty-two of the 128 patients (47%) went directly for laparotomy, based on physical findings or positive peritoneal lavage. ⋯ However, the majority of patients with grade V injuries were unstable, and 92% required laparotomy. Twenty-six of 46 patients treated nonoperatively (56%) had injury to the posterior segment of the right lobe of the liver or a "split liver." In retrospect, only 33% of patients with hepatic injury required laparotomy for therapy of the liver injury. Hemodynamic stability and anatomic pattern of injury on presentation were important factors in successful nonoperative management of hepatic injury.
-
Comparative Study
Diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin resuscitation of hemorrhage: comparison of a blood substitute with hypertonic saline and isotonic saline.
Resuscitation with tiny volumes of hypertonic solutions rapidly restores tissue perfusion while minimizing edema after hemorrhage and tissue trauma. ⋯ DCLHb restored mean arterial pressure and ameliorated the development of flow-dependent oxygen consumption. Base deficit, a reflection of systemic oxygen debt, was minimized with this blood substitute. DCLHb may represent a superior small volume resuscitative fluid after trauma and hemorrhage.
-
We conducted a retrospective review to determine the early effects of implementing the American College of Surgeons (ACS) level II criteria on the number of transferrals and survival rates of trauma patients in a rurally based hospital. Data were collected from time period "B" (13 months before) and time period "A" (14 months after) implementing ACS criteria. Patient data parameters included age, sex, Revised Trauma Score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Injury Severity Score, number of days hospitalized, diagnoses, place of injury (i.e., local county or transfer from another county), outcome, and probability of survival. ⋯ A much higher percentage of these patients were transfers from out of county (period B = 33% vs. period A = 59.5%, p = 0.0001). Despite a higher percentage of transferred patients with probability of survival < or = 25% (period B = 25% vs. period A = 58%, p = 0.002), the survival rate in this group improved from 7.5% during time period B to 25.5% after implementing level II criteria (p = 0.0303). This data suggest that implementing level II ACS guidelines has the early beneficial effects of increasing transfers of seriously injured patients and improving survival in the most critically injured group.