J Trauma
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Use of a single question to screen trauma patients for alcohol dependence.
Alcohol-dependent trauma patients are known to be at future risk for both recidivism and mortality. Psychological tools exist to screen for alcohol-dependent disorders, and among patients with alcohol-dependent disorders, a brief intervention has been shown to modify behavior. However, the training involved and time required to administer these tools may decrease their utility. We explored the possibility that yet simpler screening tools could be used. ⋯ It may be reasonable to substitute a single question for the entire AUDIT screening instrument to screen for those at risk for alcohol misuse. If so, this single question could easily be incorporated into the history taken among patients admitted to a trauma service. Confirmation with a larger study is recommended.
-
Comparative Study
A rational approach to formulating public policy on substance abuse.
Unlike alcohol, which is legal and regulated, current public policy makes drugs such as heroin, cocaine, methamphetamines, and marijuana illegal. This article summarizes the history of drug and alcohol use in the United States, compares our public policies on alcohol to those on drugs, and shows the direct link between alcohol or drug use and crime, corruption, violence, and health problems in other countries and in our own. A rational approach to formulating a workable public policy is presented.
-
We conducted a comparison of methods for predicting survival using survival risk ratios (SRRs), including new comparisons based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) versus Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) six-digit codes. ⋯ Predictions of survival based on anatomic injury alone can be performed using ICD-9 codes, with no advantage from extra coding of AIS diagnoses. Predictions based on the single worst SRR were closer to actual outcomes than those based on multiplying SRRs.
-
This article summarizes current knowledge about the accuracy of screening tests and the efficacy of interventions for substance use disorders in different medical settings (including trauma centers) where the practitioners are not specialists in the management of substance use disorders. In the first section, we introduce basic screening approaches for psychoactive substance use disorders and issues of natural history, risk factors, and populations at risk. ⋯ We found strong evidence to support the effectiveness of brief interventions in managing at-risk drinkers; however, the evidence is only suggestive for drug use disorders. Finally, we explore the implications of the findings for developing a public health approach to early intervention, particularly as it relates to the unique needs of trauma centers.
-
Most trauma surgeons are unfamiliar with screening, brief intervention, and referral (SBIR) programs for substance use disorders, and few trauma centers provide them. This report describes how an urban private-teaching hospital adapted a protocol from an existing emergency department-based program to include patients treated by the trauma service. ⋯ SBIR services can be effectively integrated into all components of a busy, urban trauma service by adding specially trained health educators to the trauma service staff. This collaboration provides effective SBIR services to both trauma and emergency service patients without interfering with patient flow or medical procedures. The relatively high percentage of patients at risk for alcohol or drug problems supports the inclusion of routine alcohol and drug screening for all eligible trauma patients.