J Trauma
-
Comparative Study
Utility of repeat head computed tomography in patients with an abnormal neurologic examination after minimal head injury.
Previous studies proposed that repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) is of no value in patients with a minimal head injury (MHI) and normal neurologic examination (NE). The goal of our study was to investigate the value of RHCT in patients with MHI with an abnormal NE. ⋯ Of all patients with MHI with an abnormal NE at the time of RHCT, 63% had a PA-NE. Although a RHCT is beneficial to patients with an acutely deteriorating or U-NE, it appears to be of little value in patients with a PA-NE. Compared with RHCT, serial NE may be a stronger predictor for the need for intervention in patients with MHI.
-
To investigate the factors that influence final visual acuity (VA) in open globe injuries. ⋯ In this retrospective study, the most important factors influencing final VA were initial VA, retinal detachment, and vitreous prolapse, all of which are important with regard to informing the patient of the prognosis and determining the approach the physician will take.
-
Comparative Study
Elevated admission systolic blood pressure after blunt trauma predicts delayed pneumonia and mortality.
Although avoiding hypotension is a primary focus after trauma, elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) is frequently disregarded. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between elevated admission SBP and delayed outcomes after trauma. ⋯ In blunt trauma patients with or without TBI, elevated admission SBP was associated with worse delayed outcomes. Prospective research is necessary to determine whether algorithms that manage elevated blood pressure after trauma, especially after TBI, affect mortality or pneumonia.
-
Comparative Study
Orthopaedic trauma clinical research: is 2-year follow-up necessary? Results from a longitudinal study of severe lower extremity trauma.
The ideal length of follow-up for orthopedic trauma research studies is unknown. This study compares 1- and 2-year complications, clinical recovery, and functional outcomes from a large prospective clinical study. ⋯ Although long-term follow-up provides a more complete picture of final outcomes and rate of recovery, follow-up beyond 1 year is difficult and expensive. In our study, it accounted for 20% of the total cost. The analysis of our data suggests that 1-year data were sufficient to address our major study hypotheses.