J Trauma
-
High cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) can cause life-threatening bradycardia from autonomic instability that may be resistant to pharmacologic interventions. Placement of a cardiac pacemaker, traditionally reserved for patients refractory to drug therapy, may be lifesaving. ⋯ Patients with CSCI life-threatening complications of bradycardia benefit from early placement of a cardiac pacemaker. Early stabilization may facilitate transfer out of the intensive care unit, mobilization, physical therapy, rehabilitation, and outcome.
-
Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) reflects autonomic dysfunction and can triage patients better than routine trauma criteria or vital signs. However, there is questionable specificity and no consensus measurement technique. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether factors that alter autonomic function affect the specificity of HRV for assessing traumatic injury. ⋯ Decreased VLF is an independent predictor of mortality and morbidity in hemodynamically stable trauma patients. Other time and other frequency domain variables correlated with some, but not all, outcomes. All were heavily influenced by factors that alter autonomic function, especially patient age.
-
We aim to analyze clinical features of patients with craniocerebral trauma after 2008 Sichuan earthquake in China. ⋯ Most patients admitted to tertiary hospitals are mildly or moderately injured. Cooperation among different departments is critical to shorten delay in emergency room. First stage wound healing or delayed first stage healing can be achieved in most patients after treatment. More than 76% of seismic injury patients in a tertiary medical center have good outcome.
-
The state of Pennsylvania (PA) has one of the oldest, most well-established trauma systems in the country. The requirements for verification for Level I versus Level II trauma centers within PA differ minimally (only in the requirement for patient volume, residency, and research). We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcome at Level I versus Level II trauma centers. ⋯ As trauma systems mature, the distinction between Level I and Level II trauma centers blurs. The hierarchal descriptors "Level I" or "Level II" in a mature trauma system is pejorative and implies in those hospitals labeled "Level II" as inferior, and as such should be replaced with nonhierarchal descriptors.