J Trauma
-
Comparative Study
Long-term comparison of a routine laboratory parameter-based severity score with APACHE II and SAPS II.
Risk score models predicting mortality have tremendous value, but because of the additional effort involved, their clinical use remains low. The aim of this study is to compare three different scores that each requires different levels of effort during admission and throughout treatment: the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), and the Dense Laboratory Whole Blood Applied Risk Estimation (DELAWARE) score. Of the three, only the DELAWARE is based solely on routine laboratory parameters. ⋯ The routine laboratory-based DELAWARE provides a reliable, valid risk assessment of the surgical intensive care patient at admission. It also provides additional information without added effort or poor interobserver reliability, which leads to better data comparability. We have to state that until now the data have been collected in a single-center and their general validity is therefore limited. By the end of treatment, the SAPS II and APACHE II had increased discriminatory ability and are therefore useful as process parameters.
-
Comparative Study
The association between skull bone fractures and outcomes in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
In traumatic brain injury (TBI), computed tomography (CT) provides a good assessment of anatomic pathologic findings and the prognostic value of CT characteristics has been well discussed. However, few studies have focused on skull bone fracture and its clinical prognostic importance. Hence, this study aims to evaluate the effects of skull bone fracture on patients with severe TBI admitted to the emergency unit. ⋯ This study shows that skull bone fracture is a mortality risk factor for patients with isolated severe blunt TBI.