J Trauma
-
Ultrasound (US) is commonly used for the diagnosis of hemoperitoneum after blunt abdominal trauma, but the value of US as an aid for identification of operative lesions after penetrating trauma is not well documented. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the accuracy of US for the evaluation of penetrating torso trauma and to assess the impact of this information on patient management. ⋯ The US examination lacks sensitivity to be used alone in determining operative intervention after gunshot or stab wounds. Rarely does US information contribute to the management of patients with penetrating abdominal injuries.
-
Current American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma criteria for major resuscitation include prehospital respiratory compromise or obstruction and/or intubation and mandate an attending trauma surgeon's presence on patient's arrival to the emergency department (ED). A substantial number of trauma patients arrive intubated, with no other physiologic compromise. We hypothesized that field or ED intubation in the absence of other major criteria does not require trauma surgeon presence on patient arrival. ⋯ Intubated patients with central stab wounds represent a high-risk group and should mandate trauma surgeon presence on patient arrival. Excluding stab wounds, field or ED intubation alone rarely requires emergent surgical decision-making. Therefore, field or ED intubation alone should not mandate trauma surgeon presence on patient arrival.
-
Comparative Study
Blunt splenic injuries: high nonoperative management rate can be achieved with selective embolization.
This retrospective review tests the hypothesis that including selective splenic arteriography and embolization in the algorithm of a previously existing nonoperative management (NOM) strategy will result in higher rates of successful NOM in patients with blunt splenic injury. ⋯ A high rate of NOM can be achieved with observation and selective use of arteriography with or without embolization in the management of blunt splenic injuries.
-
We hypothesize that data collected from computed tomographic (CT) scans obtained for workup of chest or abdominal injuries provide data that are sufficient to screen for spinal fractures and will decrease the cost and time of spine evaluation after trauma. ⋯ We recommend using the data acquired from CT scans to evaluate the spine, supplementing them with additional studies only when needed for further clarification.
-
TRISS remains a standard method for predicting survival and correcting for severity in outcome analysis. The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) is emerging as a major source of trauma data that will be used for both primary research and outcome benchmarking. We used NTDB data, to determine whether TRISS is still an accurate predictor of survival coefficients and to determine whether the ability of TRISS to predict survival could be improved by updating the coefficients or by building predictive models that include information on co-morbidities. ⋯ In the NTDB the traditional TRISS had limited ability to predict survival after trauma. Accuracy of prediction was improved by recalculating the TRISS coefficients, but further improvements were not seen with models that included information about co-morbidities.