J Trauma
-
This study focuses on the analysis of snowboarding versus skiing injuries, especially fracture, dislocation, or both, of the elbow, based on 7 years of medical records and roentgenograms of patients injured at a ski-snowboard area, Mt. Zao National Park, and demonstrates the precise characteristics of snowboard injury in the elbow region. ⋯ Posterior dislocation; fractures of coronoid process, radial neck, and radial head; and extension-type fracture of the distal humerus characterize the particular and frequent injury mechanism responsible for snowboarding trauma in the elbow region. Thus, snowboarding injury of the elbow is recognized as a severe injury and is characterized by a frequent risk of posterior dislocation, fracture, or both. The severity of elbow injuries in snowboarding mainly seems to be due to direct mechanical force on the elbow, receiving the full impact of falling down, combined with an outstretched hand and elbow extension, or with an outstretched hand and longitudinal thrust force, to the proximal radius and ulna and distal humerus.
-
The main disadvantage of the pedicled groin flap for hand reconstruction is the long period of immobilization required. Early division of the pedicled groin flap is desirable for both patients and surgeons. The aims of this study were to investigate whether ischemic preconditioning can effectively accelerate the neovascularization of the junction between the donor and recipient sites in the pedicled flap, and the most objective method of judging the timing of early division of the pedicled groin flap. This report is the first prospective study to use ischemic preconditioning for early division of pedicled cutaneous flap combined with laser Doppler measurement. ⋯ With ischemic preconditioning, the pedicled groin flap can be safely divided postoperatively at a mean period of 8.4 days according to the laser Doppler measurement, especially when the perfusion unit ratio of clamping over nonclamping reaches more than 36.6%.
-
Comparative Study
Comparative use of magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiologic investigation for the prognosis of head injury.
To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electrophysiologic investigation as prognostic methods in acute head injury. ⋯ MRI scans performed early after head injury provide several indicators for unfavorable outcome. Electrophysiologic investigations add to this prognostic evidence. Both methods have comparably high specificity. However, because of the higher density of prognostic information obtained, MRI seems superior to electrophysiologic testing.