J Trauma
-
The difference in speed, efficiency, and safety between diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and abdominal computerized tomography in the evaluation of adult blunt trauma patients with multiple injuries was investigated. ⋯ Patients with severe head injury, open fractures, or any evidence of hemodynamic instability are better served by DPL as the primary diagnostic modality. Its sensitivity and specificity are equivalent to those of computerized tomography; this facilitates evaluation and allows for simultaneous procedures and quicker initiation of definitive treatment.
-
To determine the degree of neutrophil activation caused by hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation. ⋯ Neutrophil activation occurring after LR resuscitation and LR infusion without hemorrhage, but not after resuscitation with shed blood or HTS, suggests that the neutrophil activation may be caused by LR and not by reperfusion.
-
Hospitalization for observation is the current standard of practice for patients who have sustained blunt abdominal trauma and who do not require emergent operation, despite having undergone diagnostic studies that exclude the presence of an intra-abdominal injury. The reasons for this practice are multifactorial and include the perceived false-negative rate of all standard diagnostic tests, the belief that hospitalization will allow for the prompt diagnosis of occult injuries, and medicolegal considerations about the risk of early discharge. The focus of this study was to determine whether hospitalization for observation is necessary after a negative diagnostic evaluation after blunt abdominal trauma, to determine the negative predictive value of abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scanning in a prospective series of patients, and to identify which patients can be safely released from the emergency department without observation or hospitalization after blunt abdominal trauma. ⋯ These data indicate that abdominal tenderness is not predictive of an abdominal injury and that patients with a negative CT scan after suspected blunt abdominal trauma do not benefit from hospital admission and prolonged observation.
-
Case Reports
Endovascular treatment of intractable oronasal bleeding associated with severe craniofacial injury.
Severe craniofacial injury may cause intractable oronasal bleeding, which is refractory to conventional treatments. This study will evaluate the efficacy of endovascular treatment for such oronasal bleeding. ⋯ Endovascular treatment is an acceptable treatment for intractable oronasal bleeding associated with severe craniofacial injuries when conventional treatments have failed.