J Trauma
-
The treatment of hypothermia associated with hemorrhage, exposure, or intraoperative intervention continues to represent a challenge for trauma care teams. An innovative technique for combining microwave heating with continuous temperature monitoring into a feedback-controlled system for blood warming has been developed. The effect of microwave warming on the structure and function of blood was compared with that in nonheated controls. ⋯ There were no changes in the hemoglobin electrophoretic patterns in experimental or control samples. This system is designed to deliver microwave energy in a uniform and controlled manner, overcoming the limitations of conventional microwave ovens that in the past caused local overheating and subsequent hemolysis when used for blood warming. The structural and functional integrity of erythrocytes after microwave warming indicate the safety and effectiveness of this technique.
-
Emergency thoracotomy is a standard procedure in the management of cardiac arrest in patients sustaining severe trauma. We examined the records of 463 moribund trauma patients treated at our institution from 1980 to 1990 to refine indications for emergency thoracotomy. Patients underwent thoracotomy either in the emergency department (ED) (n = 424) or in the operating room (OR) (n = 39) as a component of continuing resuscitation after hospital arrival. ⋯ Patients with penetrating trauma and in profound shock (BP less than 60 mm Hg) or mild shock (BP 60-90 mm Hg) with subsequent cardiac arrest had survival rates of 64% (27 of 42) and 56% (30 of 54), respectively. None of the patients with absent signs of life, defined as full cardiopulmonary arrest with absent reflexes (n = 215), on initial assessment by paramedics in the field, survived. We conclude that (1) no emergency thoracotomy should be performed if no signs of life are present on the initial prehospital field assessment; (2) emergency thoracotomy is an indicated procedure in most patients sustaining penetrating trauma; (3) blunt traumatic cardiac arrest is a relative contraindication to emergency thoracotomy.
-
Comparative Study
Prospective comparison of clinical judgment and APACHE II score in predicting the outcome in critically ill surgical patients.
Prospective identification of patients who will not survive has been proposed as a means of limiting utilization of medical resources including critical care. This study prospectively compared prediction of outcome for surgical ICU patients by clinical assessment and the APACHE II score. Five hundred seventy-eight patients were assessed within 24 hours of admission by the ICU attending physician and predicted to live or die. ⋯ Over 40% of patients predicted to die by both methods actually survived. This study demonstrates that clinical assessment is superior to APACHE II in predicting outcome in this group of surgical patients, although the difference is small. In addition, this study suggests that neither clinical assessment nor the APACHE II score, when obtained within 24 hours of admission, is very reliable at predicting which surgical ICU patients will die.
-
Emergency center thoracotomy was performed at our facility on 389 patients from 1984 through 1989. There were no patients excluded from the study, and survival for all patients was 8.3% with survival rates of 15.2% and 7.3% for stab and gunshot wounds, respectively. Emergency center thoracotomy was performed on 42 patients suffering from isolated extrathoracic injuries with 7% survival. ⋯ Of the survivors, prehospital endotracheal intubation prolonged successful toleration of CPR to 9.4 minutes compared with 4.2 minutes for nonintubated surviving patients (p less than 0.001). Emergency center thoracotomy is useful in the resuscitation of victims dying of penetrating truncal trauma. Prehospital endotracheal intubation significantly lengthened the time of successful CPR.
-
Comparative Study
Vascular injuries in a rural state: a review of 978 patients from a state trauma registry.
The demographics, etiology, and outcome of 1148 vascular injuries suffered by 978 patients reported from eight trauma centers in a largely rural state to a trauma registry (NCTR) data base containing 26,617 patients entered over a 39-month time interval were analyzed. Vascular injury patients were more frequently transferred by helicopter (18%), referred from other hospitals (45%), transfused more blood (8 units mean/24 hours), had higher mean ISS values (14 vs. 9), had lower systolic blood pressures on admission (113 vs. 128 mm Hg), had higher emergency department mortality (3.3%), and required immediate surgery more often (79%) when compared with nonvascular injury NCTR patients (p = 0.0001). Vascular injury patients had significantly longer hospital stays (13 vs. 10 days), longer ICU stays (5 vs. 4 days), and greater hospital costs ($22,500 vs. $12,300) while incurring more serious AIS values for the regions of the chest, abdomen, and extremities. ⋯ Forty-seven percent of vascular injuries were extremity lesions; the amputation rate was 1.3%; and management was most often by simple repair (41.9%) or patching (22.2%). Rural vascular injury patients had a high incidence of blunt trauma (43.4%) and were older (average, 51 years); they were transported by helicopter more often (30.3%) and were frequently referred from another hospital (77.8%); they had longer ICU, ventilator, and hospital stays and greater hospital charges; and they had higher mortality (14.2%) compared with urban vascular trauma victims. The data suggest a need for the trauma care system to focus on earlier recognition, stabilization, and rapid transportation of this most seriously injured group of patients.