Cancer
-
Clinical Trial
Ifosfamide and etoposide plus vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide for newly diagnosed Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors.
This study was conducted to determine the feasibility of, and improve outcome by, incorporating ifosfamide and etoposide (IE) into the therapy of newly diagnosed patients with Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors of bone and soft tissue. ⋯ Despite substantial toxicity, the integration of IE into the front-line, VAdriaC-based therapy of patients with Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors is feasible and appeared to significantly improve the outcome for patients with high risk localized tumors, but had no impact on the poor prognosis of patients with metastatic tumors. Local control can be achieved in the vast majority of patients using radiotherapy exclusively, even among patients with bulky, central axis tumors. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the late effects of this intensive therapy.
-
Topotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that has good penetration across the blood-brain barrier and significant antitumor activity against human brain tumor xenografts. In a Phase I trial in children with refractory cancer, topotecan was well tolerated when administered as a 24-hour infusion. The maximum tolerated dose was 5.5 mg/m2 and the dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. This Phase II study of topotecan was performed to assess the activity of topotecan against childhood brain tumors. ⋯ Topotecan administered as a 24-hour infusion every 21 days is inactive in high grade gliomas, medulloblastomas, and brain stem tumors.
-
Neuroblastoma is the most common malignant cause of spinal compression in the pediatric population. More than 30% of patients who are impaired prior to treatment remain impaired after the completion of therapy. Those who do not improve after decompressive laminectomy may go on to develop severe delayed spinal deformities. ⋯ By treating patients with dumbbell neuroblastoma initially with chemotherapy, the authors were able to reduce the size of the intraspinal mass in 58% of patients, improve partial neurologic deficits in 92%, and avoid neurosurgical decompression in 60%. Neurologic deficits also improved in 83% of patients requiring emergent neurosurgical intervention.
-
The cost of infusional administration of cancer chemotherapy has been assumed to be more expensive than the traditional bolus schedule related to the use of durable medical equipment and other components of the delivery system. The objective was to develop a model of projected charges as a basis for the cost estimate for selected common chemotherapy regimens comparing the cost based on charges for bolus and infusional chemotherapy schedules. ⋯ The perception that infusional delivery of chemotherapeutic agents adds to the cost of cancer care is appropriate for some regimens but the absolute amount of cost increment is generally modest. The principle cost differences between bolus and infusional schedules relate to drug dosage and the toxicity profile. Generally, but not consistently, infusional schedules use lesser doses and are associated with lesser toxicity. Although the benefit of infusional delivery of chemotherapy in terms of response rates and survival are comparable to bolus schedules for 5-FU infusion and 5-FU + LCV in colon cancer, this has not been established for the regimens analyzed for breast cancer (CMF, CA) or lymphoma (CDE, CHOP). The misperception of cost advantages for bolus delivery should not preclude comparative trials of bolus versus infusional chemotherapy schedules and cost should be studied prospectively in clinical trials comparing different schedules of administration in addition to studies of quality of life and toxicity.