Clin Cancer Res
-
The camptothecin derivative topotecan has been postulated to mediate its antitumor effect through a drug-induced increase in covalent topoisomerase I-DNA complexes. If this hypothesis is correct, then schedules of exposure to topotecan that maximize the number of topoisomerase I-DNA complexes should produce the greatest cytotoxicity. We identified schedules of exposure to topotecan that maximize levels of complexes in vitro and used these schedules to postulate effective schedules of exposure in vivo in a mouse xenograft model. ⋯ Topotecan given daily (0.6-2.2 mg/kg) or every other day (1-3.3 mg/kg) for 2 weeks, repeated every 21 days for three cycles, produced complete regressions of Daoy xenografts; however, daily exposure was required to achieve complete regressions of Rh30 xenografts. We conclude that effective intermittent schedules of exposure to topotecan, based on biochemical parameters, can be identified. The clinical utility of each schedule will depend on the relative antitumor effect compared to the toxic effect on the bone marrow, which usually limits administration of topotecan to patients.
-
Advanced prostate cancer remains largely incurable, primarily because the very low growth fraction present in these tumors makes them generally resistant to treatment with standard chemotherapeutic agents that target cell division. Effective therapies should therefore induce death of prostate cancer cells, independent of their growth rate. trkA, the high-affinity tyrosine kinase-linked receptor for nerve growth factor, has been implicated in prostatic cancer growth and may represent a molecular target for therapeutic agents. ⋯ CEP-751 is selective for cancerous versus normal prostate cells and affects the growth of only a limited number of nonprostate tumors. Importantly, CEP-751 induces cell death of prostate cancer cells in a cell cycle-independent fashion and, therefore, represents a novel therapeutic approach to the management of both hormone-dependent and hormone-independent prostate cancer.
-
A single high-dose cycle of chemotherapy with stem cell support can produce disease-free survival of 15-20% for at least 3 years in women with responding stage IV breast cancer. North American Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant Registry data suggest that a complete response (CR) is the single most important prognostic factor associated with prolonged disease-free survival. Therefore, if sequential high-dose chemotherapy can increase the CR rate, then perhaps an increased proportion of patients will remain disease free. ⋯ Seventy-eight percent are progression-free at a median follow-up of 14 months (range, 3-24+). Three sequential cycles of high-dose chemotherapy are feasible and were administered in this study with no mortality. Single agent paclitaxel at doses up to 825 mg/m2 were well tolerated with moderate reversible toxicity.
-
The excessive proliferation of the myeloid marrow compartment in Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute and chronic leukemias has been largely attributed to a hyperactive and autonomously acting hybrid tyrosine kinase BCR-ABL, a product of the fusion between the second exon of the c-ABL proto-oncogene and 5' portions of the BCR gene on chromosome 22. This specific molecular event, amenable to attack with specifically designed inhibitors, has recently been successfully influenced by the drug CGP-57148 in mammalian cells transfected with full-length BCR-ABL gene and expressing full-length p210Bcr-Abl protein, as well as in primary human leukemic cells expressing p210Bcr-Abl fusion protein. In view of the heterogeneity of BCR-ABL transcripts associated with various phenotypes, we investigated the effect of CGP-57148 on p190Bcr-Abl- and p210Bcr-Abl-expressing, patient-derived cell lines and primary intact blast cells. ⋯ Exposure time and dose appeared to be important variables among various cell types. Moreover, effective doses appeared uniformly harmless to cells lacking BCR-ABL protein functioning as tyrosine kinase. Thus, the continuous exposure of target cells, at least during the initial period of 24-48 h, may prove to be an important variable in the design of in vitro and in vivo therapy using tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
A phase I and translational study of sequential administration of the topoisomerase I and II inhibitors topotecan and etoposide.
Because topoisomerase (topo) I- and topo II-targeting agents exert their principal effects on the two major classes of enzymes involved in regulating DNA topology in the cell, there has been considerable interest in evaluating combinations of these classes of agents. In preclinical studies of inhibitors of topo I and topo II in combination, drug scheduling and sequencing have been critical determinants of antitumor activity, with a greater magnitude of cytotoxicity generally occurring when treatment with the topo I inhibitor precedes treatment with the topo II-targeting agent. The underlying mechanism that has been proposed to explain this schedule dependency is compensatory up-regulation of topo II and, therefore, enhanced cytotoxicity of topo II inhibitors in cells treated initially with topo I inhibitors. ⋯ Successive biopsies of accessible tumors were obtained for quantitation of topo I and II levels prior to and immediately after treatment with TPT and prior to and immediately after treatment with etoposide in seven patients. The results of these limited studies in tumors did not fully support the proposed mechanistic rationale favoring the development of this particular sequential TPT/etoposide regimen, because only two of the six patients' tumors in whom topo I was successively measured had either modest or substantial decrements in topo I levels following treatment with TPT, and the principal effect of interest, up-regulation of topo II following treatment with TPT, was clearly documented in the tumors of only one of six subjects in whom successive measurements of topo I were performed. Even in view of the notable objective antitumor activity in three subjects, including a complete response in a patient with colorectal carcinoma and partial responses in one patient each with non-small cell lung and gastric carcinomas, the toxicity and ancillary laboratory results do not provide substantial evidence that sequential treatment with TPT and etoposide might be more advantageous than either TPT or etoposide administered as a single agent.