Acta Orthop Belg
-
Venous thromboembolism is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients. Mechanical and pharmacological methods of thromboprophylaxis are available and guidelines relating to thromboprophylaxis in trauma include those published by the American College of Chest Physicians, the UK-based National Institute of Clinical Excellence, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network and US-based Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. ⋯ Given the risk of thromboembolism in trauma patients and increasing interest in this condition clinicians should be aware of local and national guidelines relating to venous thromboembolism prevention in trauma patients. This paper reviews methods of thromboprophylaxis and compares guidelines relating to their use in trauma patients.
-
Comparative Study
Operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Comparison of plating and intramedullary nailing.
Plate and screw fixation (PSF) has always been the more common surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures. However, intramedullary nailing (IMN) of the humerus has gained in popularity over the last two decades. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing of midshaft humeral fractures. ⋯ A reoperation was necessary in 143% of the PSF patients and 163% of the IMN patients (non significant difference). In this retrospective study, IMN did not achieve better results than PSF of humeral midshaft fractures and was associated with more postoperative complications. Based on these findings, we suggest that plating of humeral shaft fractures should be considered as the primary treatment for all surgical indications, except for some open fractures requiring temporary external fixation, pathological fractures, humeral shaft fractures in morbidly obese and osteopenic patients, and large segmental fractures of the humerus.
-
Cannulated screw fixation is a minimal invasive technique to treat undisplaced femoral neck fractures. It is the preferred method in elderly patients who often suffer co-morbidities. There is scarce literature on subtrochanteric femoral fracture as a complication of cannulated screw fixation of a femoral neck fracture. ⋯ The overall incidence reported in literature is 2.4-4.4% (mean: 2.97%). Despite a broad use of this type of osteosynthesis, the literature does not provide clear biomechanical or clinical indications for optimal screw placement to avoid this complication. Considering the literature and our personal results, surgeons should be aware of this severe complication; they may opt for a different implant in the very old, osteoporotic patient with an undisplaced femoral neck fracture.
-
Osteosarcoma of the proximal fibula is a rare entity that poses a surgical challenge. Limb salvage is the goal of treatment, and this entails sacrifice of the common peroneal nerve as well as the anterior tibial artery. Also the loss of the lateral collateral ligament and biceps attachment leads to unavoidable knee instability which requires special reconstructive procedures. ⋯ Seven of these patients are still alive without evidence of disease. Our results indicate that the sacrifice of the common peroneal nerve ensures a wide margin of resection which in turn correlates with long-term survival. Furthermore, our technique of reconstruction of lateral knee structures has produced good functional outcome without significant postoperative knee instability.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
No drain, autologous transfusion drain or suction drain? A randomised prospective study in total hip replacement surgery of 168 patients.
We performed a prospective, randomised controlled trial to assess the differences in the use of a conventional suction drain, an Autologous Blood Transfusion (ABT) drain and no drain, in 168 patients. There was no significant difference between the drainage from ABT drains ( mean : 345 ml) and the suction drain (314 ml). ⋯ Patients that did not have a drain inserted stayed in hospital a significantly shorter period of time, compared with drains. We feel the benefits of quicker drying wounds, shorter hospital stays and the economic savings justify the conclusion that no drain is required after hip replacement.